Jump to content

motsa

Curlie Admin
  • Posts

    6778
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by motsa

  1. You only submitted a week ago. Please wait at least a month after submitting before inquiring about the status of your submission here. Thanks.
  2. Please don't start a new thread to inquire about a site you've already asked about -- please reuse the original thread.
  3. Re: http://www.qldaccommodation.com/ That would be "on the basis of an [/i]editorial[/i] judgement". Sites that have been listed for years are deleted every day when someone discovers them and determines that they don't warrant listing. Note: I wasn't the editor involved with this particular site but I certainly wouldn't email a webmaster, whose site I deemed inappropriate for listing, telling them what I was doing. That would just open me up for longwinded discussions about why their site should be listed and why I was a horrible meanie for deleting them....and possible spawn retaliation against my email account. Not worth it, IMO. It's a rare editor who will email you to tell you they're deleting your listing. Frankly, you can have as many sites as you like but the larger site is really the only one that is likely to get a listing in the ODP (I say likely because it really depends on the sites involved). In your case in particular, http://www.qldaccommodation.com/ really has very little content period that isn't covered by the hotels' web sites themselves being listed and when the listings themselves duplicate of what is available from the main national site, there is zero point from an ODP perspective in listing the state-specific subsite(s). From my POV, you would have to add a significant amount of unique information that isn't available on the national site and is particular to Queensland and isn't replicated on any of a number of other sites about Queensland. I can't really be more specific than that.
  4. Re: Status Submitted where?
  5. I personally hate Java applets the way hutcheson hates Flash (note: I''m not too fond of Flash either but applets are my real buggaboo). I can tell when I've hit one because my computer slows to a virtual standstill.
  6. Well, it's always going to be positive from our point of view so keep 'em coming until it stops being positive for you. <img src="/images/icons/laugh.gif" alt="" />
  7. If it isn't, it will be moved to the appropriate one.
  8. It's the content of the site that determines where the site would go. Care to give a specific example so we can give you a more specific answer to your question?
  9. As Robert said, we can't say when the site will get reviewed. It could be tomorrow or it could be months from now. Sorry.
  10. Where did you submit?
  11. Other editors tend to look thru every now and again.
  12. You're waiting in the queue along with a dozen or so other sites. No need to resubmit.
  13. You're waiting in the queue along with less than a hundred other sites. You don't need to resubmit the site.
  14. Actually, if you reread my earlier response to you, you'll see that you were waiting for review in http://dmoz.org/Shopping/Clothing/Fur (now you're one of a handful waiting in the Faux subcat there).
  15. There's a thread with just that subject in the Editors Lounge forum here. Try posting there.
  16. What on earth are you talking about?
  17. No need -- it'd probably just end up in the misplaced submissions folder again. It will get shifted to the right unreviewed queue eventually. Check back again in about a month (in this thread).
  18. I don't see you sitting in the queue of that category. Did you get an error message when you submitted?
  19. tlewis, vbman was talking about connection problems to this site, not editor logon at dmoz.org.
  20. Please don't start a new thread to check on a site you've already asked about -- reuse the old thread. And please leave at least a month between queries.
  21. Not sure what you're looking for here since we don't give status updates the day a site was submitted (please wait a month before asking and please use the original thread, instead of starting a brand new one like this).
  22. In general terms (and assuming the first submission was still in unreviewed), the second submission would have overwritten the first one. In this particular case, though, it doesn't matter because the site in question is a Cognigen affiliate and won't be listed.
  23. Please don't start a new thread to check on a submission you've already asked about -- reopen the old thread.
  24. Having just had a really good look around your site, I have to say that I doubt that it will be listed since the marketplace is completely empty.
  25. You're waiting in the queue along with over a dozen other sites. Your position in the queue really doesn't matter as editors can review sites in whatever order they choose. You're not the oldest submission but you're not the newest either. You can inquire about the status again (in this thread, not a new one) in a month's time.
×
×
  • Create New...