Jump to content

nea

Meta
  • Posts

    3046
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

nea last won the day on November 1 2007

nea had the most liked content!

2 Followers

About nea

  • Birthday 03/20/1973

Personal Information

  • Editor Name
    nea

nea's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

2

Reputation

  1. nea

    Norsk

    Observera att det inte längre går att få status på anmälda nettsteder. Se http://resource-zone.com/forum/showthread.php?p=188385 . Andra ODP-relaterade ämnen går fortfarande bra att diskutera. :moz:
  2. I'm afraid it's still waiting for review in http://dmoz.org/Shopping/Sports/Wrestling .
  3. Still waiting in Adult/Computers/Internet/Searching/Link_Sites/Picture_Posts/.
  4. Re: Update for designhaus-i-d.com Resubmit the update - there must have been some kind of glitch the first time.
  5. Re: Update for designhaus-i-d.com There is no update request for designhaus-i-d.com waiting in Business/Industrial_Goods_and_Services/Engineering/Consulting/Design/, and there is no sign of one being deleted. Did you submit to Business/Business_Services/Design/Industrial_Designers instead of making an update request? If so (and even if you didn't), do make an update request like thehelper advised in the category where you are currently listed. Use the "Update URL" link in the upper right corner of the page. If you submit to the new category instead it is likely to be deleted as a duplicate.
  6. No, your suggested description wasn't commented on - this forum is for telling submitters their site status, not discussing them, and as Jim said your status is "awaiting review".
  7. Yes - the same option that every submitter has.
  8. Re: http://www.cybervox.net The update request has been rejected by several different editors who judged that you are appropriately placed in your current category.
  9. I'm very sorry but there hasn't been any change yet. Your site is still waiting for review with only a couple of others.
  10. Re: Status of http://profits.cc - please Please use your original thread to enable us to see what's been said about the site before. Thanks
  11. nea

    Svenska

    Hur lång tid det tar varierar - jag har redigerat länkar som har legat och väntat i två år eller längre... Men det finns inget du kan göra annat än att vänta. Skicka inte in länken igen, för då skriver du bara över den första anmälningen! Jag har rensat bort en del spam från de ogranskade länkarna i kategorin, så nästa gång någon redigerar där är det mycket möjligt att han eller hon tittar på din länk. Det låter inget vidare, men det är det bästa jag har att komma med....
  12. nea

    Svenska

    Hej! Jo, webbplatsen väntar i den kategorin, så du behöver inte skicka in den igen. Att du fick svaret att den redan fanns i katalogen är märkligt - det måste ha varit en tillfällig bug, för den har inte varit listad tidigare. -nea
  13. The present description already mentions fragrance so I'm not quite sure what you mean? That being said, you can go to the category where your site is published and use the "Update URL" link in the top right corner to submit an update request. But bear in mind that if you only want to add a keyword it is very unlikely that the description will be changed.
  14. No, I'm afraid it hasn't - they do their thing, we do ours Not unless you give us a clickable link to the category you submitted to. Well, I can at least try. There are several reasons, but at the heart of them all is the fact that the ODP is manned by volunteers. We don't have to review suggested web sites at all; most of us do, but all of us also find web sites on our own to add to the categories we edit in. (Note that I don't say "our categories" - we may feel particularly strongly about the cats we get to edit in but that doesn't mean we own them or can decide on our own what goes there or not!) The submitted sites are suggestions that carry no greater weight than the sites we find ourselves. There are many sites we wouldn't find without the site suggesting feature, and that's the reason why it is there, but there are also many sites that don't get suggested and it is up to us to find those. Editing from the top down in a list of web sites would soon kill the editing pleasure for most of us. In particular in spam prone areas, I and many other editors start by weeding out the spam and duplicate submissions, then I'll often look for update requests and deal with those, and then review some of the remaining sites. Sometimes I feel like a challenge and tackle the more difficult suggestions, and sometimes I pick those that are easy. It all depends. And sometimes the cat needs to be fed in the middle of a site review and I'll leave the computer and go on with something totally different when I return. That's how I work, and it may not be the same for other editors. Hope it made the editing process a little more clear, in any case.
  15. Your site has been listed in the category mentioned above. As soon as the public pages are updated (unfortunately we don't know when this will happen - staff is working on it) you will be able to see it there. In the meantime, it is in the data base, and any downstream data users like Google Directory will get the current data base if they upgrade
×
×
  • Create New...