Jump to content

windharp

Meta
  • Posts

    4674
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by windharp

  1. Re: Status: http://www.fitseek.com It is waiting for review in a rather smart queue.
  2. Thats what the ODP internal editor forums are meant for. Not for the purpose of misuse but for checking those sites <img src="/images/icons/smile.gif" alt="" />
  3. Die Seite wartet leider noch mit einer ganzen Reihe anderer drauf, dass ein Editor die Zeit (und Lust) findet, sie zu bearbeiten. (Btw: Ich mag keine Firmen die Domains, die mal anderen Inhalt hatten, auf kommerzielle Domains völlig anderer Ausrichtung umleiten... <img src="/images/icons/frown.gif" alt="" /> )
  4. I think I would be able to post without any spelink-mistages when I was allowed to use german for all my answers. But I guess you dont want me to do that... ;-)
  5. Still waiting for review in a small queue.
  6. Please reread what I wrote above.
  7. Yes, still waiting. (And listed in http://dmoz.org/Computers/Software/Shareware/Windows/Business_and_Finance )
  8. Crowded place, that... Your site is waiting for review in a rather large queue.
  9. The easiest way would be to apply for the category where you think the new category should be placed and suggest that the new category should be created. Maybe give a link to this thread, too.
  10. Site is waiting in a small queue, on the first glace I would say the rest is 90% spam. So I would guess that if an editor comes around to review sites he might process yours, too.
  11. Re: http://www.headcovers.com/ No, of course you are not. Would be quite unfair ;-)
  12. To me it means I can count them using one hand (or two hands maybe) <img src="/images/icons/wink.gif" alt="" /> But please note, that this is not necessarily related to the time-to-review. That depends on so many factors, that we are unable even to give an educated guess. May be from 5 minutes to several years - mostly depends on the amount of editor activity in that region which is not predictable.
  13. Re: http://www.headcovers.com/ They are put on the public pages via a queue. This normally needs only some seconds to some mintutes. Due to the recent HDD crash the queue had been disabled for some days and thatfor was behind for some time. I dont know exactly, but yersterday I had the feeling that it is back to "as good as instantly" again. [EDIT] Some additions, not meant for your eyes only - more for the general public. I can understand you very well, doing internet-business is a difficult thing. Please note, that the ODP never guaranteed listings, which was stated in the rules almost since the beginning. The weight, some search engines put on an ODP-listing is something we have no influence on and which was never intended by the founders of the ODP. So please dont blame us for googles technology ;-) It may sound stupid, but there is a point that the forum guidelines say "We dont process your listings after you posted here" - it would not be manageable. We need a lot more time to process single entries than to process a whole category at one time. We might react on an "there is a mistake in that entry" request, but we wont review a site after someone posted here.
  14. In fact you did submit http://www.readersrefuge.com.au/ which is now waiting among a hand full of other sites for an editor to come along and review them.
  15. For the future: Please keep all information to one thread. You can edit your posts to add data with the little "edit" link in it :-)
  16. Re: http://www.headcovers.com/ I would assume that someone checking your submission status has visited you site.
  17. I have seen that it is waiting, but did not process it. I choose to remove some spam first.
  18. You might be able to draw some information out of this thread where I just posted. Most of those categories have a large backlog and thatfor are not given to new editors (the frustration rate in such a category is high, the amount of "damage" an abusive editor could make is very high, ...). If you want to see the fun that editing could be - start in a regional category. For example with yout hometown (or for big cites with a part of it).
  19. Since it looks like no Metaeditor wants to answer this one, I'll give it a try. I'm no metaeditor and thatfor not directly involved in processing new esitor applications. You are right that the category is not to large, but keep in mind that a lot of sites are waiting for review. I processed some of them, trying to reduce the number so that new applications could be acceted easier. In that process I have seen that most of the submissions are spam. In fact I was only able to delete about 20% of the waiting sites and unable to list a single site of those I viewed. I assume, that the fact that a lot of sites are waiting (category size counts as "published sites+unreviewed sites" for an application) and the percentage of spam makes metaeditors think twice about accepting new editors for that category.
  20. 1) Please keep all discussion about Adult categories to the Adult forum. Registration for that part of this board can be done in the members section. 2) Reasons for rejection are not discussed in public. And its not possible to look into rejected applications afterwards. If you know you are rejected, you should have received a mail, stating the reason why. Some usual reasons: - You applied for a category thats to large (including all physical subcategories). - Your sample URLs where not apropriate for the category or already listed apropriately - Your spellink or grammar was not acceptable - You where not honest about yourself As stated above, that are just some guesses. There are a variety of other possible reasons.
  21. Reasons for rejection are not discussed in public. And its not possible to look into rejected applications afterwards. If you know you are rejected, you should have received a mail, stating the reason why. Some usual reasons: - You applied for a category thats to large (including all physical subcategories). - Your sample URLs where not apropriate for the category or already listed apropriately - Your spellink or grammar was not acceptable - You where not honest about yourself As stated above, that are just some guesses. There are a variety of other possible reasons.
  22. Erledigt, Danke. Bitte verwendet neue Threads für neue Fragen die nichts mit den alten Inhalten zu tun haben, das ist wesentlich übersichtlicher.
  23. Continue in this thread in the appropriate forum.
  24. Listed in http://www.dmoz.org/Regional/Europe/United_Kingdom/England/Hertfordshire/Harpenden - real estate sites are listed at the hometown level if possible.
  25. In english, yes. Of course you can use this forum, was just a hint to make it easier for you. Other languages fora are not split into topics because of the lower amount of traffic.
×
×
  • Create New...