web

Re: http://accessories-cellphones.com/ Any updates would be greatly appreciated - Thank You <img src="/images/icons/smile.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/images/icons/smile.gif" alt="" />

Re: WebSite Submission Status Please? any good news about acceptance of the doors2go listings?

Re: WebSite Submission Status Please? We are becoming old friends - a month has passed - any new info (good news I hope)? <img src="/images/icons/shocked.gif" alt="" /> Have A Nice Day

Re: http://accessories-cellphones.com/ We had initially looked at the link that you had given before contacting you: http://dmoz.org/Shopping/Consumer_Electronics/Communications/Wireless/Cellular_Phones/Accessories/U/ Unique Cellular - Nokia cellphone accessories. USA Cell - Distributors of cellular phone accessories along with performance charts and univerals fittings. was what we found with a - Nov 2 2002 update. So, that the editor is not wrongfully accused of a mistake, please allow us to take the blame. When the site was initially accepted it was with no redirects. Because of: troubles with the e-commerce host and new additions to the site - this was a reaction to an urgent situation that caused what seems like the doorway page. In the future the site will be as one - however, this approach was the only immediate thing that could be done. Thank you ettore for taking the time to respond twice.

Re: http://accessories-cellphones.com/ the site has definitely been removed because of the lack of hits. and we check the GOOGLE directory after the dmoz went down. the site - since it's acceptance - has expanded to include audio equipment and is encompassing an additional division and shopping cart- thus the links to steo, We would appreciate a new placement of the site in a more expanded catagory rather than completely removing it. also, the accessories-cellphones domain is going to emcompass the direction the site is going Thank You for the prompt response. <img src="/images/icons/smile.gif" alt="" /> I have always wanted to visit Italy

accessories-cellphones.com Hello: http://accessories-cellphones.com/ This site was submitted and accepted (listed} almost one year ago - we can not find it now. Shopping/Consumer_Electronics/Communications/Wireless/ We submitted under the cellphone accessories catagory - because it is basically an e-commerce accessories site. It has expanded over the last several months to include audio electonics. Thank You for your help over the past few months on other sites

One month has passed What is our current status please?

Re: WebSite Submission Status Please? Thanks for reminding me to ask again after a month or so. Today is exactly one month. <img src="/images/icons/smile.gif" alt="" /> Have a Nice Day

Resubmitted http://5url.com/dhtml.html Resubmitted http://5url.com/dhtml.html under a few programming related catagories a few weeks ago - any new status info would be appreciated please? Have a NICE Day! <img src="/images/icons/smile.gif" alt="" />

Re: WebSite Submission Status Please? Hello again, advancedemedia.com was just accepted and is now in the rdf dump. What is the status of either: doors2go.com or doors2go.com/sales ?

Re: Site was listed for 2 years then removed yesterday I truly want to thank you all for taking so much time to respond and the civility - I really am surprised because I did not expect this. This forum is extremely valuable because it gives an insight - I have posted this forum on many webmaster related forums, and have received thanks from a number of webmasters who had NO idea this "resource" existed. In reference to the various replies I have received The 5url.com/ is pagerank 5 5url.com/dhtml is pagerank 6 it may have gone down because Dmoz is no longer a link. Dhtml is a resource for people who like dynamic interaction with websites, with just a little code you can get flash java and photoshop effects that are client-side. However- it changes rapidly - some are different depending on the various Netscapes' and IE's differing standards. The site is mainly geared for those who KNOW dhtml so that is why the examples are not elaborated on. (there is a elaborate desciption the bottom about the tecnicalities of dhtml) Those scripts were a result of four and one half years of hard work - that is why it is on angelfire - where it was begun in 1997 the year that dhtml was invented. I had received so many compliments and requests over the years for the scripts that I had decided to publicize it on dmoz. This is really separate from 5url.com/ don't forget - I could have easily given it another url or just USED angelfire. The DMOZ standards changing over the two years would NOT apply here because the site had been re-checked sporadically by the editor (my reffer logs tells me who visited and from where) The title and the description has been changed occassionally so the site was noticed! Also, the site was just revisited and retitled and redescribed by the editor several hours before I had written a private email asking for a reconsideration of the edited changes. It was several hours AFTER that - the site was removed!!!(I looked at my referrer logs to ascertain this information) TCFB is different from 5url.com the basic service is offered by some other designers this is their own work. They have their own company. So PLEASE don't delete them. We work together often, but we are seperate!!!! 5url.com/ is our multi media and programming company. The range of services are different. I appreciate that comment about the browser sizes, I am constanty examing my reffer logs to see what browsers, resolutions, color etc are being the norm. I finally designed the sites for both 800 x 600 and 1027 x 720 because about 96% of everyone was using those two equally. We enjoy reading these feedbacks! <img src="/images/icons/smile.gif" alt="" />

wonder if these topics are read by the chief admin wonder if the forum is perused by the chief (hierarchy) administrators fo Dmoz - are they ever the catalyst for policy reforms or revisions.

Re: Site was listed for 2 years then removed yesterday The reason that the page rank was mentioned was because it is a difficult thing to accomplish - and usually verifies the validity of a site. I would Literally have No idea whether "Dmoz editors" care about PageRank - if you have the Google Toolbar downloaded it is indicated automatically as well as being indicated on the Google Directory. I did not Mean Literally that the number 50 should be used. When looking at the other sites in the same directory - there was virtually No mentioned of the word several. Several has connotations of being "few" - hardly an enticing allure for anyone reading the description to visit. The previous description - which was in use for months (the last update on the site previously was early Dec. - was very very valid and pertainent (Last update: 7:04 PT, Friday, December 6, 2002) (dynamic html dhtml examples and demos - Examples, demos and an explanation of dynamic html, sprite, active x, and direct x codes. ) The new description - even with more quality content - was suprisingly sparse. I know it is very hard to envision the Shock of something like this, if it has Not happened to you - but that website (50 pages) has been a work that is 4 years in the making!!! I wish to truly Thank All of YOU who cared enough to Reply to my concern.

Re: Site was listed for 2 years then removed yesterday The website's url is http://5url.com/dhtml.html The site has been on Dmoz for 2 years. (it was accepted on the FIRST submission with LESS content) The site was re-reviewed yesterday, and given a description that indicated "includes several graphic examples and basic explanation" An private email was sent because there are 50 web pages of examples of dhtml, and a couple-hundred worded explanation, on the same page as the 50 links. Feeing that it was justified to Ask for a modification. i used that form that is provided by Dmoz to email editors, which offers the option to add your email address. I added my email address - no reply was sent. Would Not it have been courteous to do so, if a site was "Suddenly" going to be deleted. I had looked at the other websites that were also listed and took notice of their content and their "deep links" (most of them had deep links, and far less examples.) The main 5url.com site is focusing on General Web Site Development. This dhtml website is focusing on Dhtml and is listed on many many many other directories and was given high ratings by the visitors. (we were getting a sizable number of referrals/visits directly from the Dmoz and Google's Directories daily) The website has a PageRank of 6 on Google. (which is Very Hard to obtain, and will go down as a result of Not being on Dmoz anymore) An organization that is open-sourced and filled with volunteers should be open to "polite" "non-abusive" critiques about how one's WebSite has been newly changed in it's title and description. Critiques should NOT be taken personally, nor should they incur someones' anger. It would be difficult to ever have an exchange with ANYONE, if there is paranoia that that individual will react so strongly!

http://5url.com/dhtml.html has been listed for 2 years in the dhtml sub-catargory; a private email was sent the catagory editor expressing concern about the change in the "description" that was made yesterday, after seeing this link in my referrer logs and checking the new description. (the new description said "several graphic examples" , there exists about 50 examples) dmoz.org/editors/editurl.cgi?url=http://5url.com/dhtml.html&cat=Computers/Programming/Internet/DHTML 17 hours later the site was removed from the Dmoz directory (although it still shows up in Dmoz Search) Partially because of the Dmoz listing, the site had a PageRank of 6 on Google. The website was re-submitted a few minutes ago to the same directory. Maybe, the deletion was a mistake - however, if not - it would be undemocratic if the simple act of politely critiquing a new description could prompt such a drastic measure.