Jezebel

The site *is* misleading. Not only have other editors rejected the site for this reason, but you've now been told this by the category moderator (me) and an Adult meta (ffabris). >"I strongly beleive that inclusion should not be based on...the '...personally...' thing" The reason the ODP works is because it is human edited. The 'personal' touch is what allows us to process submissions more accurately than software. Personally, I think this thread has gone on far too long. We are not here to tell you how to build your sites, nor are we here to argue with disgruntled submitters. Please refrain from posting any more replies to this thread unless it is to ask for submission status once your site has been improved and re-submitted. <img src="/images/icons/mad.gif" alt="" />

Hi, I'm afraid you misunderstood me. <img src="/images/icons/crazy.gif" alt="" /> I didn't say that your bananas were already well represented in the directory. The problem is simply that, with the current layout of the site, accidents can (and have) happened. It's not at all clear to the surfer (or the editor reviewing the site) which part of the site is yours and which isn't. If, for example, you were using banners to advertise AEBN's content, this would be plain and simple for all to see.. as it is the design is such that it all blends seamlessly together - and before you know it, your site has been declined a listing because it is 'misleading'. Addressing your oak tree analogy : As far as possible, editors are supposed to ensure that each site has some unique content on it. Each editor usually becomes an expert in their field, therefore spotting content used over and over again isn't really all that hard. >Thank you ... I will follow your advice on the category when service #2 is gone. No problem. We will look forward to seeing it. <img src="/images/icons/laugh.gif" alt="" />

Hi, >Actually Only option 2 is an AEBN thing Ahhh. I see you're right, I do apologise. It seems to me that option two could be, and has been, seen as being 'misleading' by more than one editor reviewing the site, which is probably why you have had a problem getting the site listed. You may well have the same problem if you re-submitted the site now, however if you're planning on removing the AEBN option you should probably consider re-submitting the site to http://dmoz.org/Adult/Image_Galleries/Movies/Members/ once it's been removed.

The site has been declined a listing. Looking at the site itself it looks as if it's nothing more than a AEBN affiliate doorway (particularly with options 2 and 3 - I'm unsure about the first one). Your site does not seem to have any content of its own. Hope that helps. <img src="/images/icons/crazy.gif" alt="" />

Re: Site status check. http://www.escortspalace.co <img src="/images/icons/crazy.gif" alt="" /> Your reasons for saying that the site has been listed in the 'wrong category' are poor, I'm afraid. Improving your page ranking, or improving navigation to your site are bad reasons for us to put sites in the wrong category. Unless you have a compelling argument, and think that your site has been wrongly categorised for reasons other than the ones you've given I see no reason to move it. <img src="/images/icons/smirk.gif" alt="" />

Re: dash publishing Dan, Our editors will respond to this thread - please do not start another one. Please be patient and we will try to help. Jezebel <img src="/images/icons/cool.gif" alt="" />

Re: Site status check. http://www.escortspalace.co It's still waiting in the queue. <img src="/images/icons/smirk.gif" alt="" />

I cannot find your site in the unreviewed queue. Please try submitting the site again. <img src="/images/icons/smirk.gif" alt="" />

Yes it is.