Accout Spam Flag Status

To whom it may concern:

First I'd like to apologize for any neglegance on my part for any wrong doing. Please understand that it is not my intention to do so.

gregh@alternativesecurity.com
In the past year, my account was flagged as spammer due to my not knowing of the existance of this site (resource-zone.com) and getting server 500 errors during submission.

I'm assuming 6 months after my knowing of my accout status, I was supposed to check back to see if that got cleared. Unintentionally, I failed to do so and I submitted more sites for review.

What (if any) suggestions might you have to rectify the issue that I have.

-=-Thanks in Advance
-=-Greg Hamamjian

stlthmav21 said:

In the past year, my account was flagged as spammer due to my not knowing of the existance of this site (resource-zone.com) and getting server 500 errors during submission.

Click to expand...

Neither of them is a reason to be marked as a spammer.
But as you have been told before "you have been submitting multiple doorways and redirects for this same site to mutiple categories. That is spam."

stlthmav21 said:

I'm assuming 6 months after my knowing of my accout status, I was supposed to check back to see if that got cleared. Unintentionally, I failed to do so and I submitted more sites for review.

Click to expand...

We don't want you to check back. And certainly don't want any more suggestions. store.yahoo.com/securitysupplyhouse/ is listed. Other related sites won't be listed.

If you have suggested sites that are realy completely different from these problem sites you are free to ask for a status in the normal way. But keep in mind we will only list one (1) site from a person/company if these sites are about the same or related products.

stlthmav21 said:

What (if any) suggestions might you have to rectify the issue that I have.

Click to expand...

Getting marked as a spammer is easy. Removing such a mark is almost impossible.

Thanks

Thanks for the info. Not what I wanted to hear but.... thats the way it is. ( Sigh)

Its one thing to reject suggestions, but its another to get on all the editors bad sides. Why, may I ask, don't the editors reply (using a DMOZ emailing system (with a "can't reply back" email address)) to suggestions? I would figure that would cut the amount of posts on this forum, no?

-=-Greg

Why, may I ask, don't the editors reply (using a DMOZ emailing system (with a "can't reply back" email address)

Click to expand...

Mostly because we don't have one.

I would figure that would cut the amount of posts on this forum, no?

Click to expand...

Possibly, but that would cut into an editors dmoz time. Replying on this forum is done by editors who want to provide the feedback in the time they wish to set aside for the purpose, and is in addition to the time they wish to spend editing.
:tree:

Gotcha

Okee Dokey.

(last post)