Advice sought from editors on proposed submission

Hi

About to submit a good friends' site to the OD.

Have read the guidelines and believe that I've assisted her in writing a factual and useful submission.

Would love feedback on whether the following may fall foul for any reason. Please share your professional opinion:

"NLP Training Course – Company Name
Neuro linguistic programming training courses established in London UK since 1987. Certification in NLP practitioner and master practitioner signed by founder John Grinder with international trainers."

The category will be:
dmoz category

Thanks Guys & Gals
Calum

Re: Advice sought from editors on proposed submiss

I'd remove 'Neuro linguistic programming training course' from the description since all the sites in the category are about Neuro Linguistic Programming and we know the site is about training courses from its title, so that information is already given.

The description also doesn't tell the visitor what they can expect to find on the site - is there a feedback form? Information about the course content? Is there a map showing where the training is being held? That kind of thing should go in.

Anyway, thanks for taking the time to write a good description, it saves us time and is probably one of the few ways to legitimately expedite a submission. Sites with good descriptions really do stand out and are more likely to be reviewed first.

Re: Advice sought from editors on proposed submiss

Actually, the title should just be the company name (not NLP Training Course – Company Name).

Re: Advice sought from editors on proposed submiss

What I would do [without seeing the site]
London UK :arrow_right: London, United Kingdom

Certification in NLP practitioner and master practitioner signed by founder John Grinder with international trainers. :arrow_right:
Certificate in NLP as practitioner and master practitioner, signed by founder Dr. John Grinder.

Re: Advice sought from editors on proposed submiss

.... and details of what is on the site.