Confused
In the ODP it says an editor should as a
“general rule of thumb: Look at the content on the site, mentally blocking out all affiliate links. If the remaining information is original and valuable informational content that contributes something unique to the category's subject, the site may be a good candidate for the ODP. If the remaining content is poor, minimal, or copied from some other site, then the site is not a good candidate for the ODP. “
As the information on my site comes directly from each city government and is designed to promote tourism in each city in Texas I can't understand why the affiliate model is offensive to the editor.
I could as my competitor does charge 1,200 to each city government to be listed on my site, which in turn would take money out of your pocket as a citizen taxpayer. Or maybe
I could take a credit card number and charge my visitors to surf my site.
I believe the content out ways the minor introductions of affiliate program links throughout my site. As you know there is a balance in the business of providing information. Free information goes away if the one that provides that information can no longer support the site.
I believe the editor of this category is affiliated with my competitor, something a few legal shots across the bow should take care of. I am correct in thinking that AOL is the ultimate owner of the ODP? And Google relies heavily on the ODP? We will let the attorneys figure this one out.