We don't know. Time scales aren't controlled and it all depends upon when some volunteer meta editor volunteers to process it .When do I get an answer?
Applications can take anywhere from 3 minutes to 3 months to process, and even that is not guaranteed. Generally you will receive a response one way or the other when your application has been processed.
The actual evaluation takes anywhere from 1 to 20 minutes depending upon the application's quality. A well researched one with no integrity issues usually takes 5-10 minutes. Other metas' mileage may vary.How long does this evaluation take?
All editor activities are performed by volunteers, including the assessment of editor applications, so there is no specific time frame involved, but as you can see from jimnoble's post, both(?) of your applications were reviewed within days to weeks, and feedback was sent to you on both(?) occasions.I think nobody is really taking care at all, neither for the links nor for recruiting new editors.
Sure, it is exactly the same answer I already gave you ...then you can maybe tell me why you have dead links in this category and the same entries since ages?
Editors work when they feel like it, and where they feel like it (within the bounds of their permissions). Nobody is "forced" to work anywhere. That's exactly what a volunteer organisation is all about.All editor activities are performed by volunteers.
Because you found them and they bother you and you want to help improve the category and there is an easy way to do it? Those look like pretty good reasons to me.why should I report them?