Complaint against DMOZ editor

Please help resolve this issue
[deleted] is a DMOZ editor in [deleted]

[deleted] personal website [deleted]

has listed some ... clients websites and does offer SEO services.

Also this is ... personal website
[deleted]
and is just 2 months old. This got listed in DMOZ with lightening speed.
[deleted]


My question and complaint is
How come editors here get privileges more than anybody else?

How come an editor with affiliation in [deleted] got an unrelated website ... ([deleted]) listed in dmoz so fast?

Don't you think, this editor has compromised the system in collusion with some other editors?
Don't you think, ... has got some of her clients websites listed in dmoz?

... did reveal in a thread that ... listed ... websites and to have a balance listed ... competitors websites too?

Please read some of ... posts and some other editors defense about this complaint on
[deleted]

I would like to request an investigation in this matter.
If this is not the place, please suggest the email id to forward my complaint.
Thanks
sridhar kondoji

----------
[edited to remove abuses of forum policy.]

This is not the place to make public acccusations against an editor.

I see that you are still online.

Please delete this post and never, ever post a public complaint naming an editor again.

As soon as I see a meta editor online, I will ask that this thread be deleted.

If you want to make a complaint about an editor, send a PM to any meta editor or go to http://report-abuse.dmoz.org/ and post a complaint there.

How would you like it if you were a volunteer in some project and someone made public accusations about you, smearing your name with the public and with your peers, and never even took the time to find out the correct way to do it?

why delete the thread?

Just edit out the names.

I will re-submit it to the right alias/email/thread.

Thanks again.

So, you won't delete your first post?

Says a lot about your credibility, doesn't it?

Thanks for your concern for efficiency, honesty, tact, and scrupulous attention to policies. They are duly noted. You have the information you need, so I'm locking the thread as (despite your best attempts), in my experience such threads have a good chance of drifting towards inimicable discourse.