Let me see if I have this straight. You have a political agenda. And there are, it seems, facts that are highly unfavorable to your political programme.
Changing your viewpoint to something more in accordance with those facts is right out, I gather. Instead, you propose to suppress the facts. But the Open Directory is making it much too easy for your political opponents to find those facts. INTOLERABLE! the ODP cannot be allowed to continue pursue some mission of "cataloging facts" -- it must be perverted to be a tool of your political propaganda; it cannot be permitted to do anything that's detrimental to your ability to impose your political views on others.
That is not at all an unusual chain of reasoning. But ... Those editors who happen to think driving ATVs is on private property is criminal trespass (and the law OUGHT to be enforced rigorously) ... are highly unlikely to agree with your own particular form of political oppression.
And, since the ODP is not a political discussion group, you aren't going to have a chance to change their (our?) minds.
Which is going to make it extremely impossible for you to impose your own vision of political oppression on the directory. If that frustrates you, that's OK.
Now, if you want to create a website expressing your political beliefs, that's your right. Now, that site doesn't have any right to an ODP listing -- no site does. But, BUT: it is the right of farmers and ecologists everywhere to know what kind of agenda you're pushing -- what kind of limitations you'd like to impose on them, what kinds of value you'd like to take from them, for the sake of your recreational activities! And that is precisely the kind of right that the ODP was established to support. So, for the benefit of our surfers, we'd probably want to list such a site. And if there are more folk like you, that also is valuable information, which we'd like people to be able to find.
So: if you know about sites that promote your political views, feel free to suggest them. We can't know when an editor will be interested in working in that area, but sooner or later someone will.
As for expecting the ODP to be your political pawn: go ahead. It's probably good for you, for you to be frustrated by a continued failure to come to terms with reality. (But that's just my personal philosophical opinion. It may not be shared by other ODP editors, but it seems to me to be compatible with the ODP mission.)
