By saying that your objectives here is "hobby" in nature, wouldn't you be less self-serving and more website surfer/shopper serving if you worked to change that?
If it wasn't a hobby which we enjoyed doing in our free time, why on earth would there be any editors at all -- apart from those who were only editing in order to list their own sites? With the exception of a hand-full of
paid staff members on the AOL payroll all our editors are volunteers that help to build a useful directory because they enjoy doing so.
perhaps an editor purge would be a good idea, ... leaving editing to those who really want to be aggressive in providing us w/ a great website resource directory.
And that would increase the collective volume of editing activity how exactly?
There is no quota or numbers restriction on editors, and the fact that a certain editor has permissions in a particular category in no way prevents other editors from also editing there. Removing an editor who does 1000, 100, 10, or even just 1 edit each month, will just mean that 1000, 100, 10 or 1 edits less are done each month, and the directory is worse off as a result.
We always welcome new editors who want to improve the directory, and somewhere around 60 new editors join the project each week.