hutcheson said:USUALLY, you can use the "update listing" link to suggest changes (including URL changes). As for all suggestions, an editor will review it and the website and decide what action is appropriate. As for all suggestions, there's no timeline or priority imposed on the editors, but "update listing" suggestions are often given a high priority by editors (because they may describe a quality problem.)
Right now, sigh, see the announcement. My guess is that site suggestions and update suggestions will return at about the same time. I won't guess when that would be.
hutcheson said:>I was just contemplating putting up a large "this page has moved" notice instead of my current redirect for the next time an editor drops by, as I would assume editors routinely check for dead or signifigantly altered content links.
There's a bot that does this. It keys off "301" style "permanent redirect" HTML status codes: if you can do that as well, it would be ideal.
No matter how we notice (whether 301 for the 'bot or text notice for the humans), we'll make the change. But you increase your odds by making it more likely that we'll notice.
>In fact it would seem editors might have more time for this currently, as new suggestions obviously aren't coming in.
A very reasonable assumption.