Re: http://www.jsplasticconsulting.com/
The submissions have not been touched by an editor; neither reviewed, added, or deleted. Multiple submissions may give you problems. An editor will want to clear all of the duplicates leaving just ONE copy behind, but it is not unknown when dealing with a long list of duplicates to accidentally remove all copies. If one category is blatently wrong then the editor there will have to move it to the correct category, where it goes to the back of the queue. To the receiving editor these extra submissions begin to look like mass-submitted spam, and when you review a site where the last 4 or 5 editor notes simply say 'Deleted Duplicate Submission' a lot of editors will hit the delete button again, thereby frying your only chance of being listed.
Both categories have around 30 to 40 entries awaiting review, including duplicates. An editor may visit tomorrow, or in many weeks, or months time; no one has any set commitments or editing quotas. When they do visit, it is usual to review all entries, rather then just the one being enquired about (that is, we don't treat this forum as an opportunity to 'jump the queue').
Please do not submit again to any of the Topical Categories, but wait about 6 weeks then enquire again in this forum, and in
this thread . [Bookmark it, and don't start a new one for old enquires; new enquiries automatically move the old thread to the top of the list anyway].
Although you should submit to only the one best Topical Category, you are also allowed to have a listing in the Regional Tree. Your site clearly says >> Greenwood, IN 46142 <<, so I would also explore the Regional category structure through the: Country - State - City, or similar, heirarchy and find the ONE most relevant category to submit to. Regional listings are usually handled a lot faster, due to less submissions and more active editors for most towns and cities.
Your website very nearly validates; though this is _NOT_ a requirement to be listed. My browser chokes on the <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 3.2 Level 3.2//EN"> doctype identifier. A much newer identifier like <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> may be appropriate.
[
Validation Results ]. There are 5 very minor errors listed for the base page to correct after solving that one. Additionally I see that there is also a <!-- tag missing from the start of one of the scripts, and no Character Set is declared (ISO8859-1 is probably the most common in use), nor Content Language. You can then apply the same methods to your subpages. None of this makes any difference to your listing.