I noticed after posting today I had 3 editors visit my site,here is one:
http://editors.dmoz.org/editor...ks1.com&cat=World/Nederlands
Everyone refers to editors as God, Is this true ?
I noticed
- Thread starter Davebarn
- Start date
I noticed after posting today I had 3 editors visit my site,here is one:
http://editors.dmoz.org/editor...ks1.com&cat=World/Nederlands
Everyone refers to editors as God, Is this true ?
It's an ethical principle that we don't review a site for listing when it's been mentioned in this forum (or, generally, in another forum in conjunction with the ODP.) Very simply, it would be unfair to other webmasters who aren't trying to manipulate editors. And it would be treacherously unfair to other editors, who would be overwhelmed by the manipulators -- if they thought it would work. (It's hard enough to squelch attempts to manipulate, even as it is.)
But all that DOESN'T say ANYONE can't visit a site (or any editor look at its logs) anytime. That's the way the web works, DUH.
In this case, it's pretty evident that Jim Noble looked at the site at least to view editing logs, since he described to you what the logs did NOT show--to wit, editor rejection. And it's common for editors to cross-check each other, so if someone DOES make a mistake of fact in this forum, someone else will catch it. Mistakes like that happen--but very rarely. And we do a pretty good job of catching them -- as you've seen. So I'd not be surprised if some other editors didn't double-check the logs. In fact, I'd almost have been surprised if nobody else did.
This is really really not the place to discuss theology; but if I were god, use of an autosubmitter would cause painful, disfiguring, degenerative neurological disorders. I deduce therefore that I, at least, am not god. As for conspiracies, if I were busy taking over the Brazilian tourist industry and suppressing politically incorrect musicians (as the story goes) I wouldn't have time for dealing with autospam sites.
But I haven't invested much time dealing with autospammers lately. Make of that what you can.
But all that DOESN'T say ANYONE can't visit a site (or any editor look at its logs) anytime. That's the way the web works, DUH.
In this case, it's pretty evident that Jim Noble looked at the site at least to view editing logs, since he described to you what the logs did NOT show--to wit, editor rejection. And it's common for editors to cross-check each other, so if someone DOES make a mistake of fact in this forum, someone else will catch it. Mistakes like that happen--but very rarely. And we do a pretty good job of catching them -- as you've seen. So I'd not be surprised if some other editors didn't double-check the logs. In fact, I'd almost have been surprised if nobody else did.
This is really really not the place to discuss theology; but if I were god, use of an autosubmitter would cause painful, disfiguring, degenerative neurological disorders. I deduce therefore that I, at least, am not god. As for conspiracies, if I were busy taking over the Brazilian tourist industry and suppressing politically incorrect musicians (as the story goes) I wouldn't have time for dealing with autospam sites.
But I haven't invested much time dealing with autospammers lately. Make of that what you can.
Thank you for your responses
motsa
you are correct there is a right way and a wrong way to deal with people I am a manager of a very large greenhouse, and I have to deal with customers on a day to day basis.......so I have cut and pasted every reply I have got today...and have sent complaints on every responce i have recieved. thank you for your information and you great help and your ability to not use sarcasum.
I will send all this information and any further information I get via your post and all the pm's I have recieved today to Netscape.
I will not post here again, thank you for your prompt responses.
motsa
you are correct there is a right way and a wrong way to deal with people I am a manager of a very large greenhouse, and I have to deal with customers on a day to day basis.......so I have cut and pasted every reply I have got today...and have sent complaints on every responce i have recieved. thank you for your information and you great help and your ability to not use sarcasum.
I will send all this information and any further information I get via your post and all the pm's I have recieved today to Netscape.
I will not post here again, thank you for your prompt responses.
reply
ummm DMOZ is a extra part of our free service and we hand type them what made you say that ?
but you did just add more bells and whistles to the pot, can I assume this is why none of my sites have not been listed is this what you are saying ?
and if so are we being bias because this means you are assuming this, we do not state this anywhere.
ummm DMOZ is a extra part of our free service and we hand type them what made you say that ?
but you did just add more bells and whistles to the pot, can I assume this is why none of my sites have not been listed is this what you are saying ?
and if so are we being bias because this means you are assuming this, we do not state this anywhere.
Is English not your first language? (That last post was jumbled beyond comprehension. And I don't even think standard punctuation would have helped.)
And -- apparently you did not understood what motsa told you not to do, because you did it. AGAIN.
You may not discuss your website any more in this forum.
And -- apparently you did not understood what motsa told you not to do, because you did it. AGAIN.
You may not discuss your website any more in this forum.