Before I waste your time and mine, I thought I'd clarify. We've done sites for three current real estate-related clients, and I've read the DMOZ Real Estate Guidelines. I had thought previously that only a company's website could be listed in DMOZ -- rather than that of someone who works for a company -- but the above guidelines make me think that may not be so.
With the understanding that no site is guaranteed inclusion in DMOZ (and that none of the sites are what are generally called "lead-generator sites", mirrors, redirects, etc.), and that none have previously been submitted, might the following be listed?
(a) Mortgage Broker
40-page site: services pages, articles, calculators
Site owned by broker who works for a company; the company does not "get" the Web and likely will never have a site.
(b) Mortgage Broker
15-page site: services pages, a couple of articles
Site owned by company owner
(c) Real Estate Agents
15-20 page site: services, areas pages
Site owned by three agents of a large-ish real estate company
If yes, I am thinking Regional/California.
What do you think?
With the understanding that no site is guaranteed inclusion in DMOZ (and that none of the sites are what are generally called "lead-generator sites", mirrors, redirects, etc.), and that none have previously been submitted, might the following be listed?
(a) Mortgage Broker
40-page site: services pages, articles, calculators
Site owned by broker who works for a company; the company does not "get" the Web and likely will never have a site.
(b) Mortgage Broker
15-page site: services pages, a couple of articles
Site owned by company owner
(c) Real Estate Agents
15-20 page site: services, areas pages
Site owned by three agents of a large-ish real estate company
If yes, I am thinking Regional/California.
What do you think?