Sites are occassionally listed by mistake, either by a new editor unsure of the guidelines or just by human error. When those mistakes are found, they are corrected. No site is entitled to remain listed just because someone listed them. That would be like saying all defacing and spammy edits made to a Wikipedia page should be kept unless three or more people agree that the changes should be reverted. If we were to add layers of bureaucracy to the process of removing sites, we'd have to add it to every other process, including adding sites and reviewing editor applications. You think things are slow now?
That is not the point. The point is WikiPedia actually responds with listing errors in the form of a reason why the article or edit was declined. There are also more than one editor in a category.
At the risk of us sounding like a broken record, DMOZ isn't a listing service. Any services we offer are aimed at users/surfers. Any benefit to website owners is a side benefit that we generally don't think about.
It does somewhat sound like a broken record. Users (as we are all users/surfers), would like to see good resources for services and/or information on the web. Not that it matters, but as an OpenSource contributer, there are several reasons why people come to my site outside of my main service. Source Code downloads (reffered from PlanetSourceCode), cheatcodes for select games (from CheatHappens), development services (from aMember, ShareASale, and google even though you mess with my site), development services (from Microsoft), and so on.
Also, the domain has been in existance since 2002. The content of the site contains ZERO ADVERTISMENTS, ZERO HIJACKS / REDIRECTS, ETC. There is no pornography. Applied category was Software Consulting. Description was the same description displayed in google now. All meta-tags are in order. There isn't an over abundance of keywording.
------------------------------
So explain to me again -- what exactly are the reasons for rejection ? My site is clearly something that "users/surfers" desire. Site rank is 3 even without your "help", and I receive around 2000-4000 unique hits/day, with visitors who stay on average between 2minutes to an hour.
------------------------------
I am sorry, but after such a long time and watching over 200 domains over a period of 10 years never get listed (even through paid DMOZ submission services who guarantee the accuracy of the selected category with description, etc), I feel that the entire software and telecommunications trees are filled with either defunct or corrupt editors.
WikiPedia has way more information to sift through than your editors do, and yet their system works -- with viable response times, and turnaround for the entity that made the original edit / entry. They also have a multi-level editing system in place which means that some editors may have permission to edit, but not remove, where other editors have access to edit -- so yes, there is a tiered review service. Turnaround time for a Wiki entry -- 4 hours. Turnaround time for DMOZ --- 2 weeks to never -- with no response back to OP!
I would strongly suggest reviewing all editors in the Software and in the Telecommunications trees. I am sure there are some good ones, but at appearance and with all of the data I have gathered over the years, there is definitely something VERY fishy going on there. Some of the categories don't even have an editor nor is there any application to become one.
For example:
Computers/Companies/Software_Development ---- Last update: Thursday, September 3, 2009 11:53:44 AM EDT
BTW: Way to go "freestyler" on maintaining a huge category in the Web Development section. I would post in your section, however my business is not primarily Web Development -- although as of late, that seems to be where business is moving.