OK, thank you all for responding.
I'm still not sure where best to re-submit it. All things considered, isn't computer-human interaction the most appropriate category after all?
In response to Callimachus, the reason I created the site altogether, was only due to the vacuum (i.e. nobody was bridging the gap of consolidating
all possibilities. It's the classic tale of the elephant & blind men each of whom has a different theory regarding what he's touching. Just take a look at all the formal & informal links on my site - and you'll get the picture.
In fact, I'm still in the process of trying to get to the bottom of this issue, having wasted endless time, expense, and disillusionment on it. That's what galvanized me.
I would LOVE it if someone would create a more professional site than mine, so that everyone with computer health issues could have a stable forum (complete with computer engineering and optometric experts) from which to get feedback and swap grass-roots experiences. Note that I'd been in email correspondence with someone who's a lighting and optical expert and she suggested I start a Yahoo photosensitivity group - even offering to be a moderator. But I declined, because I didn't think I could handle it. (As it is, you may note my signature in the board linked to the site -
Administrate sporadically, due to monitor health issues
P.S. You may not believe this, but someone just emailed me thanking me for my article and when I asked how she found it (since as far as I knew, it hadn't yet been indexed on DMOZ or Google etc.) she responded that she found it via Google. For crying out loud - only a few days ago I checked, and it wasn't on Google, and now, practically simultaneous to posting on your board, voila!
Is your board magic or what?