http://5url.com/dhtml.html
has been listed for 2 years in the dhtml sub-catargory; a private email was sent the catagory editor expressing concern about the change in the "description" that was made yesterday, after seeing this link in my referrer logs and checking the new description.
(the new description said "several graphic examples" , there exists about 50 examples)
dmoz.org/editors/editurl.cgi?url=http://5url.com/dhtml.html&cat=Computers/Programming/Internet/DHTML
17 hours later the site was removed from the Dmoz directory (although it still shows up in Dmoz Search)
Partially because of the Dmoz listing, the site had a PageRank of 6 on Google.
The website was re-submitted a few minutes ago to the same directory.
Maybe, the deletion was a mistake - however, if not - it would be undemocratic if the simple act of politely critiquing a new description could prompt such a drastic measure.
has been listed for 2 years in the dhtml sub-catargory; a private email was sent the catagory editor expressing concern about the change in the "description" that was made yesterday, after seeing this link in my referrer logs and checking the new description.
(the new description said "several graphic examples" , there exists about 50 examples)
dmoz.org/editors/editurl.cgi?url=http://5url.com/dhtml.html&cat=Computers/Programming/Internet/DHTML
17 hours later the site was removed from the Dmoz directory (although it still shows up in Dmoz Search)
Partially because of the Dmoz listing, the site had a PageRank of 6 on Google.
The website was re-submitted a few minutes ago to the same directory.
Maybe, the deletion was a mistake - however, if not - it would be undemocratic if the simple act of politely critiquing a new description could prompt such a drastic measure.