Re: soldbyteresa.com
Per a request from Lissa, I am posting a message I sent to her outlining a response to her requests and suggestions for a site I previously submitted. I hope my experience helps this forum's readers as much as it helped me:
Hello there Lissa,
I relatively recently submitted a website for inclusion into the DMOZ directory under the location:
http://dmoz.org/Regional/North_America/United_States/Maryland/Localities/P/Pasadena/Business_and_Economy/Real_Estate/
The website is:
www.soldbytersa.com
Originally the website was rejected. You were kind enough to write back to me with some guide lines as to how I could improve the site so that it might be accepted. Please see message string:
http://resource-zone.com/showflat.php?Cat=&Number=56059&page=91&view=collapsed&sb=3&o=&fpart=1
Initially you stated that my web site was a template and that most of the template sites didn’t have much information about the agents. I definitely agree with what you were saying and originally thought that I avoided that concept. Also you reference that I was part of, “The Answer Team Real Estate Network.” That is correct. However, I would like to mention and address what you said about owning a template site and being part of an office.
Currently we are an office of four real estate agents here in Pasadena Maryland. We have a designer that designs and maintains our four websites and the look and feel which is unique to our team only. However, we are still individual agents that like to maintain our individuality. This is why we feel we wouldn’t want to submit my site under the office category and the leads that come from my site are for me. Yet, our web designer is working on a new and improved team site that will hopefully be accepted into the network that we as agents share the leads generated by that site.
Additionally, you mentioned I may want to provide photo’s of past listings. We as a team feel that when it comes to usability, seeing photos of a home that is already sold isn’t addressing the consumer’s needs. They want to see homes for sale. This is partially why our sites look the same, because we collectively decided to format our home pages so that they answered the consumer’s needs first, then they could worry about whether or not they liked me personally; this is also why our information about us is out of the way.
I would also like to mention the “About Me” section of my site. I have seen the validity of your statement:
“As far as your personal website soldbyteresa.com goes, if you can provide more information about your own background and knowledge pertinent to the local area, and where your focus is, you should be eligible for a listing under Pasadena/Business_and_Economy/Real_Estate”
I have hopefully addressed that to some degree by adding information about myself, my technical abilities and information about the surrounding area. I even added a photo of my mobile office:
http://www.soldbyteresa.com/about_me.htm
I know you also mentioned that you thought our testimonials were nice, but perhaps copied. If you don’t mind, I like sharing that particular testimonial, so I kept it there. I sincerely hoped that I have satisfactorily addressed these issues. If you could review them and reconsider adding my site to the directory, I would be most appreciative.
Thank you for your time and definitely appreciated attention.
Hypntzd3