Eschatology isn't our bag, man: just ontology. But IMO there is no question whatsoever that the site shouldn't be listed currently. It's definitely what we call an "doorway site". There's no reason someone couldn't make a site (even using that same domain) with listable content: but so long as the main purpose of the site is to drive customers to the other site, we call it an "affiliate doorway" -- and refer you to the submittal policies for how and where not to submit it.
[The following free public-service technical notice is completely independent of any considerations related to ODP editing and/or listings.]
As an entirely separate issue, you might want to look at your second page with a browser that actually complies with the W3C standards for MIME types, because your server's giving out as "text/plain" a file that purports to contain HTML markup. (Server configuration issue, or perhaps missing extension on file name?)
(The Infernal Exploder, in a typically Microsoftian flagrant violation of the standard HTTP protocol, tends to ignore the MIME type in favor of your local system's "file type binding" (which in my experience sometimes has no relationship whatsoever with the server's file type list) and/or its best guess of the doctype (based on some rather careless parsing of anything that looks vaguely SGML'ish, which can also be pretty poor.) If you didn't review the site with a real browser, you would have missed that.)
