Suggesting URL names seems to be hard
Dear Donald,
Thank you for your reply.
I received the following reply from the reviewer, it seems I have errors in naming the urls that I suggest. I attempted to read the guidelines link provided below but I think it is only accessible to editors, I would appreciate if you can provide me another source:
"Hello Atat,
While we are always looking for new editors, I am afraid we cannot accept your application at this time due to the titles and/or descriptions from your sample URLs. I sincerely hope you will re-apply in the near future.
To improve your chances for acceptance into the project, please suggest 3 urls relevant to the category requested. The three urls should be from different sites and follow the guidelines in
http://editors.dmoz.org/add.html for instance, the titles should be the title of the site or the firm/organization as appropriate, and the descriptions should describe the site-- not review it-- free of marketing language and first or second person verbiage. Your spelling, capitalization, and sentence structure are also being evaluated.
Good luck. "
Best regards,
donaldb said:
It looks like that application was denied.
