Status of http://www.canadarxconnection.com

windharp

Meta/kMeta
Curlie Meta
Joined
Apr 30, 2002
Messages
9,204
Sorry to say, but that category is _very_ backlogged - more than 200 submissions waiiting. Yours is waiting there, too.
 
Y

yukon4

Oh boy! Thank you for the update though. Can you tell whether we're getting close to the top, or we're still way, way back there?

Thanks again,
May May
 

motsa

Curlie Admin
Joined
Sep 18, 2002
Messages
13,294
Technically there is no "top" or "bottom" of the queue since editors can edit sites in any order they choose. Therefore, any indication we could give you of where your site is when the list is sorted by date is meaningless.
 
Y

yukon4

Just checking to see if any decision has been made on this site yet. (I had started another thread yesterday, inquiring about this site - sorry about that. Should I delete it? I didn't see a way to do that.)

Thank you!
May May
 

motsa

Curlie Admin
Joined
Sep 18, 2002
Messages
13,294
Just ignore the other thread. As I noted in that thread, though, it's too soon for you to be asking about this site again. Please leave at least a month between queries.
 
Y

yukon4

Hi again - My last inquiry that was answered was on March 3, so is it permissable now (April 9) to do a status check?

All I'm really trying to find out is if the site was rejected and we aren't "waiting" for anything anymore. Thanks very much.
 

lachenm

Meta/kMeta
Curlie Admin
Joined
Aug 2, 2002
Messages
1,610
Yes, you're still waiting, and the category is still very backlogged. You can ask again after at least a month, but with this kind of backlog, you'll probably have to be patient. I'm sorry I don't have better news for you.
 
Y

yukon4

Hi again - Just trying to determine if this site has been rejected or still waiting. It's only been 4 months since we initially submitted the URL. Thank you...
 

dfy

Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2002
Messages
2,044
Your submission is still sitting there in a huge queue, waiting for someone to come along and look at it.

I'm sure you realise that this is a very spam prone area, and it requires lots of checking before anything can be added. Right now, what with the servers being updated and editing capacity limited, we have other priorities.
 
Y

yukon4

Hi folks - We submitted this site to ODP way back in February 2003. It was accepted into the Yahoo Directory quite a while ago, (if that has any significance). Can anyone at DMOZ tell whether we are "in" or "out"? Also, could someone explain why sites are not reviewed in the order in which they are received? Thanks.
 

nea

Meta & kMeta
Curlie Meta
Joined
Mar 28, 2003
Messages
5,872
It was accepted into the Yahoo Directory quite a while ago, (if that has any significance).

No, I'm afraid it hasn't - they do their thing, we do ours :smirk:

Can anyone at DMOZ tell whether we are "in" or "out"?

Not unless you give us a clickable link to the category you submitted to.

Also, could someone explain why sites are not reviewed in the order in which they are received? Thanks.

Well, I can at least try.

There are several reasons, but at the heart of them all is the fact that the ODP is manned by volunteers. We don't have to review suggested web sites at all; most of us do, but all of us also find web sites on our own to add to the categories we edit in. (Note that I don't say "our categories" - we may feel particularly strongly about the cats we get to edit in but that doesn't mean we own them or can decide on our own what goes there or not!) The submitted sites are suggestions that carry no greater weight than the sites we find ourselves. There are many sites we wouldn't find without the site suggesting feature, and that's the reason why it is there, but there are also many sites that don't get suggested and it is up to us to find those.

Editing from the top down in a list of web sites would soon kill the editing pleasure for most of us. In particular in spam prone areas, I and many other editors start by weeding out the spam and duplicate submissions, then I'll often look for update requests and deal with those, and then review some of the remaining sites. Sometimes I feel like a challenge and tackle the more difficult suggestions, and sometimes I pick those that are easy. It all depends. And sometimes the cat needs to be fed in the middle of a site review and I'll leave the computer and go on with something totally different when I return.

That's how I work, and it may not be the same for other editors. Hope it made the editing process a little more clear, in any case.
 
Y

yukon4

Hi again,

Thank you for the update. Just for the record - this site in question is NOT an affiliate site of another company. The service it offers is no different than several other Canadian pharmacies that ARE included in ODP, such as "McKnight's" and "Maple Leaf Meds". See this page: http://dmoz.org/Shopping/Health/Pharmacy/Online_Pharmacies/

These sites, as well as Canada Rx Connection sell prescription meds at discount AND invite others to become affiliates of THEM. These sites themselves are not affiliates of others.
 

xixtas01

Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2003
Messages
624
I believe you that there are sites already listed in this category that do not conform to current guidelines. If they were submitted today they would not be included.

We probably will not remove them, however, because there is a lower threshold for sites already listed.

Regards.
 
Y

yukon4

Hi again!

That's exactly my point! None of these sites are violating any guidelines. These sites are not affiliates of another "bigger" entity. They are inviting others to be an affiliate of THEM. No different than what Amazon.com (the mother of all affiliates) does, which is also listed in ODP. I understand that sites that are smaller affiliates of another site, reselling the exact same product, wouldn't be conforming to the "affiliate guideline", but that is not what these sites in question are doing. Is there not a difference?
 

xixtas01

Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2003
Messages
624
I should have used the word "standards" not "guidelines", sorry. There are unique individual standards for different categories and branches of the directory. Some of these standards are viewable by the pubic, and some not.

I understand that you want to recieve an explanation of why your site was not listed. That we will not do. Nor will we argue with you about the decision that was made. The editor who reviewed your site decided not to include it.

Your site is not banned or barred from inclusion in the directory. If, in the future, the site changes to include more original content, you can resubmit if you would like.

Good luck with your business!
 
Y

yukon4

Hi - one more time! Please don't misunderstand me, I'm not arguing to be included, nor do I need to know the individual editors decision-making process. I just wanted to point out what seems like large discrepancies in the application of the posted guidelines. I also do realize that this new "Canadian pharmacy" category is a "hot" one, especially with the US pharmaceutical industry! I'm simply their webmaster - the site is doing very, very well. Thanks once again for all your time.
 
This site has been archived and is no longer accepting new content.
Top