morrisflorey.com was never listed (hence we would not have got an update for it) - we have
http://austin.citysearch.com/E/V/AUSTX/0001/39/72/ which as you say is dead.
You should have submitted an update request for that URL instead of submitting egmlaw.com separately.
Instead of deleting the dead URL I have substituted the new one - the change should be on the public servers in a few days, maybe more, but it is done. Thanks for drawing this to our attention.
http://www.austintexascriminaldefense.com was submitted by someone with the initials KG at lawinfo.com - you could get in touch with him and warn him that his practice of submitting mirror sites is harming him and his clients, including you. Apart from it breaching our rules with the potential consequences being the exclusion of
all related sites, it is clogging up the pool of unreviewed sites, causing additional unnecessary work, and adding greatly to delays. I suspect editors will probably start to completely ignore anything and everything he/she submits to us on the basis that it is probably a mirror, whether it is or is not.
As an example, one editor could have seen egmlaw.com as a mirror of austintexascriminaldefense.com and excluded it, another might have seen austintexascriminaldefense.com as a mirror of egmlaw.com and excluded that one too. Result - total exclusion. These things really do happen.