Status of richardc020.com

Post and update the status of my submitting my http://www.richardc020.com/ (entitled richardc020) as submitted around 07/2004 (a.k.a. "July 2004") to Computers/Internet/On_the_Web/Weblogs/Personal/R or (not and) Arts/Online_Writing/Journals/Personal/R or (not and) Society/People/Personal_Homepages/R. It's been so long that I can't even remember the exact date or exact category.

Disclaimers:

1. Do not let my lack of perfect memory reduce my request.
2. I can neither find the thread which details the segregation's detail nor read those categories' non-existent "Description" pages, but I'm aware of and not insensitive to the passion regarding how to segregate those 2 categories.
3. If it was rejected, it'd be nice to know why; I do this not to contest the editors but to work towards the same goal you do. I can't apologize for the extra labor this involves.

Copy-paste the

1. status
2. and cat_notes

for the listing. I want to know

1. whether the reasons for not being listed are per usual delay, editor intervention, personal displeasure, etc.
2. and why it was delisted from its former placement there (see above for categories; again, memory isn't precise) as it's been a personal site with only a blog for 3 years (a.k.a. nothing controversial, no grounds for delisting).

The site is waiting review in the first category you mention. It appears to have been bounced around a bit trying to find the right category (the bouncing complicated by overaggressive submitting, with editors trying to trim down to one submittal in the right place) but hasn't been rejected altogether.

Beyond that:

>Do not let my lack of perfect memory reduce my request.
You ask the impossible. If you had not named the right category, in general we simply could not have found the submittal. ("Carry me to the moon. DO NOT let the law of gravity reduce my request." Gravity outweighs such edicts, no matter how forcefully dictated.)

>2. I can neither find the thread which details the segregation's detail nor read those categories' non-existent "Description" pages...
Look at the description one category level above. The content rules for all the letter subcategories are identical.

>3. If it was rejected, it'd be nice to know why; I do this not to contest the editors but to work towards the same goal you do. I can't apologize for the extra labor this involves.
No apology needed; there's no useful answer that can be given, and no extra labor would be taken trying to find one.

>Copy-paste the 1. status 2. and cat_notes
People lose editing privileges for this. Don't ask.