Paul Falcone said:
Your cynical response and damning quote makes me believe that human edited directories are illegally discriminatory, arbitrary and capricious.
A point of fact - when you suggest a URL to the ODP, item 1 on that page provides a link to the "damning quote" that you mention, with the text:
"Please take a moment to review some of our submission policies and instructions. It is important that you understand these policies."
Further down that same form it says:
"We are not a search engine and pride ourselves on being highly selective. We don't accept all sites, so please don't take it personally should your site not be accepted."
and lastly, at the bottom fo the form, it says:
In exchange for ODP's consideration of the site I am submitting, I agree
* To waive any claim related to the inclusion, placement, exclusion, or removal of this or any other site in the ODP Directory or to the title or description of any site appearing in the ODP Directory;
So, by filling out this form, you implictly agreed to all of this.
Your BS "human editing" efforts will ruin Google with your discriminatory "human edited" crap.
You are definitely entitled to your opinion. Google, thus far, thinks otherwise.
My site is in the top ten listings in every other search engine/directory except Google. Their algorithim picked up the DMOZ delisting status for
www.GuestDiscounts.com when they mistakingly bought the site.
Sorry - what site did Google buy? I'm not sure I understand what you are trying to say, here.
Are you aware that you participate in the KKK of search engines
and are part of such a injurious and misguided group?
If we believed this I am sure most of us would not edit there.
As I said, you are entitled to your opinion about the ODP, I won't fault you for that. I just wanted to remind you of some of the things you agreed to when you suggested the site for review.
Thanks.