status of www.web-rome-hotels.com

Dear dmoz editors,
please let me know the status of http://www.web-rome-hotels.com
submitted to
http://dmoz.org/Regional/Europe/Ita.../Rome/Travel_and_Tourism/Lodging/Directories/

Thank you.

Your website is not listable in this directory has been declined. The reason will be found within our Submission Guidelines. Please do not resubmit.

Hi jimnoble and thanks for the prompt reply.
Can you please be so kind to specify which are the matters that dont let me to get in the odp ?
This because my site had been listed for a year, but one day it had just been removed with no apparently reasons.

Thank you very much.

When a company offers multiple sites with related content, we'd prefer to list a central site from which all of these single sites would be accessible.

Ok thanks for the reply, but I'm still not convinced at all
If you browse the category http://dmoz.org/Regional/Europe/Ita.../Rome/Travel_and_Tourism/Lodging/Directories/

You'll find lots of sites that dont respect this point
just for example: http://rome-hotels.jollyhotels.com/
has it's central site: http://www.jollyhotels.com/

or

http://www.nycerome.com/
has http://www.nyceparis.com/ and http://www.nycevenice.com/ and http://www.nyceflorence.com/ and some others..

or
http://www.romeby.com/
has all the sites you can find on the bottom of the homepage

So I'm sorry if i can look polemic, but I really would like to understand why my site has been removed while the others, that give the same service as mine, are still listed.

Thank you!

Claudio.

I don't edit in your category, but I'd like (vaguely) to defend our decision on the jollyhotels.com sets. That's appears to be a real hotel chain, and it seems defensible. I agree with you in regard the other sets -- however, I don't edit in Europe at the moment, and there may be some concensus regarding those sites of which I am unaware, or some information in the sites which distinguish it from the vast majority of hotel reservation sites.

Well, what are the facts here?

Some editor is, as you see, working to clean up the quality problems in the directory.

The job isn't finished, as you say (and I'm not going to argue with that.)

What else is to discuss?

You're going to argue with me over the priorities some OTHER editor set for himself? When neither you nor I has any right to impose any priorities on any editor; and neither you nor I has the right to ask any editor what priorities they chose?

That seems a waste of time, no?