nea:
I understand the process (Editalls, Metas, etc.) but when I first submitted this site in
April of 2003, I recall that there were 84 sites listed. Now there are only 77. Wouldn't you agree that 15 months seems like a rather long time? If not, can you at least give me a rough idea of how long it takes, on average, for a site to be reviewed?
hutcheson
The other site I mentioned is
www.surgicalclinicofca.com, which I think I first submitted in June of 2003, and is a completely different site. While both sites are surgical practices and both offer bariatric surgery, they are two different entities as even a cursory comparison of the surgeons' names, office addresses and contact info would readily show. This should NOT qualify as SPAMMING, even though much of the bariatric content is the same (the bariatric surgeons of the two clinics were once partners and agreed to let me use similar content on their respective sites).
I didn't submit either site to the regional categories for fear of being suspected of spamming and because both clinics market their services to patients throughout the U.S. and Canada. However, if you are telling me that I can safely do so without being accused of spamming, I will gladly follow your recommendations.