ok, i just dont believe onyone that he claims that is a editor.
jimnoble said:
In this case, yes it does and you have already been told the outcome of that review elsewhere.
Are you refering to this post?
Originally Posted by scoobby
My site dont have propert contain to be listed????Oh god! thats amazing, spend so much money just to have my customers dont pay 15% up the price of the hotel to book online in the big advretised sites, and the open directory project refuse to give to the people the chance to find my site so they can spend less money.I thought that this was the whole idea of dmoz,i guess i was wrong.
You keep missing the point:
1. You admitted submitting again and again and again which was against the guidelines you agreed to when you submitted. How do you think any directory (DMOZ or other) should treat you after you deliberately flouted the policies you agreed to.
2. There is already a website listed that looks like yours; has the same information as yours; has some of the same contact details as yours - DMOZ does not care its owned by your brother, its simply not going to list two websites providing the same information. It appears you are trying to scam DMOZ to get multiple listing for the hotels you are associated with.
DMOZ is not a listing service for webmasters, so yes :
Quote:
i guess i was wrong
are you agree with this person saying that my site have nothing to provide?If you were willing to spend your holidays in naxos and you as editor trying to find hotel with online booking you wouldnt prefer to book it from the hotel owner in order not to pay 15% or 10% up that big advertised sites take?