We still do not understand why other people get straight answers to their queries, and we are not.
I'll give it to you straight. We know that you or someone on your behalf has breached the guidelines on the multiple submission of the same or related sites. We need to know the extent of those multiple submissions so we can tidy up the inappropriate ones, leaving just the one principal site for an editor to review. In the absence of such information we may have to assume that you consider multiple submissions of the same or related sites to be acceptable practice, maybe have done it before, maybe have a version of your site, or a related one, already listed. That is the sort of thing usually associated with the evidence in front of our eyes already. It is the reason we can exclude
all sites related to you ultimately.
Could you please give us a link to refer to on some of the answers.
Absolutely not -
you give
us links to sites you have submitted, on your own behalf or perhaps for clients. We can then tidy these up and make sure only your principal site is included and that any client sites submitted are genuinely not related to your own business except as a client.
So far you have given incorrect information on the extent of your submission activity and when it has been done. We have given you an opportunity to correct your mistakes because we really do want to give one of your sites a listing in due course if it passes a review. You can accept that opportunity or not and if not we will arrive at our own conclusions and deal with the situation under our guidelines for submitters of multiple identical or related sites, but time is running out for second chances at making a voluntary disclosure of your submission activity.
