Submission Question

Toefuzz

Member
Joined
May 19, 2005
Messages
6

hutcheson

Curlie Meta
Joined
Mar 23, 2002
Messages
19,136
No, it's not appropriate. The editors may decide (for exceptionally good sites, and for otherwise ill-served topics) to add such deeplinks. But don't submit.

Don't necessarily judge by current practice what is acceptable. This is one area where the consensus is moving toward fewer deeplinks; over time, more old deeplinks will be removed, and fewer new ones added.

My own standard for deeplinks is: compare the content with a feature article in, say, Smithsonian, National Geographic, Dictionary of National Biography, Grove's Dictionary of Music, or similar reference sources (that is, substantially MORE than Encarta or encyclopedia.com or Britannica Micropedia). If the deeplink is comparable in amount and quality of content, and if the site as a whole is not so focused that one would not naturally look there for that kind of content, then it is a reasonable deeplink. Obviously a well-served topic would have higher standards for deeplinks, and for a poorly served topic we would be more inclined to deeplink less content.
 
This site has been archived and is no longer accepting new content.
Top