premierpet said:
How hard is it really to "Approve" a site? Say an editor has 100 sites, start at 1 and "Approve" or "Deny" it. Doesn't make sense why it should take years to get a site listed or more so getting an editor to approve your site?
OK, I'll try to explain what I as an editor must do to review a website
1) login to DMOZ
2) go to the category
3) select one of the waiting sites to be reviewed [at random or by some strange reason I feel to use at that moment]
4) open the website and look at all its content
5) if listable write or rewrite the title and description to meet our guidelines [most of the times this is neccessary]
return to step 3 or maybe to step 2 until I don't want to edit anymore
Reviewing and writing a description will easely take 5 to 10 minutes and many times even more. So I won't be reviewing many sites in 1 hour, and some of them will be not listable.
And now the real problem.
On day 1 I decided to review 5 websites before I went on doing something else (we do have a life outside DMOZ).
On day 2 I login again.
Am I going to work in the same category? Maybe.
I yes, will I process the "next" website waiting? Most probably not.
Reason: what is next. I never review sites on date they were suggested. Maybe I will review the 2 websites suggested today because they have descriptions that are very close to our guidlelines. Or maybe worse I found some websites myself and am going to list these, no suggested sites processes on that day at all.