where is the justice

hi all

i have submited my site <url removed> 2 years ago

why it is not active uo to now

thank all

We don't know because we haven't looked. We will not answer questions about individual websites. Our FAQ contains several general answers.

The only justice the ODP considers is finding sites that contain unique content for the benefit of web surfers looking for the information, not for you (the site owner). You are only one of tens of thousands of sites suggestions that are submitted to the Directory, wait your turn like everybody else.

No site is guaranteed a listing, and the ODP doesn't want every site.

but i think not all websites that included have unique content

but i think not all websites that included have unique content

i saw alot of sites included but not having that unique content

i respect domz.org team opinion's and i hope that they

include my site onday

I agree. I sent a link to my photography website for Toronto area about a year ago,using my c-panel software. Since then I am still waiting,afraid to resubmit. It's just not fair. I just noticed that the listing got an extra 2 websites,which were created a few months ago. It seems like there are no set rules on who to approve. I personally know a famous photographer who quit waiting after 2 years.
And please don't tell me that my site does not have a relevant content.You are welcome to check my profile to see what I am trying to submit.

cheers

I sent a link to my photography website for Toronto area about a year ago,using my c-panel software.

Click to expand...

http://www.dmoz.org/add.html

Auto-submission software is (and always has been) a violation of this procedure. Sites submitted automatically are flagged and deleted after the submission is accepted, without notification to you.

Click to expand...

--

about a year ago

Click to expand...

Since then I am still waiting,afraid to resubmit.

Click to expand...

Many of the suggestions waiting for review were lost in the server crash in October 06 - if you have not suggested it again since the system came back online (ie this year) please do so once more. A second suggestion is OK, as it catches the small percentage of sites that don't make it for technical reasons, it's multiple resuggestions we want to stop. You aren't close to spamming with 2.

I just noticed that the listing got an extra 2 websites,which were created a few months ago.

Click to expand...

Just means someone took an interest in reviewing sites in a particular category. Site creation date is irrelevant.

It seems like there are no set rules on who to approve

Click to expand...

Well there are no set timeframes, that's true. There are no guidelines on who but rather on content. There's a lot of reading but it's all public if you start at http://www.dmoz.org/guidelines/

the directory is controlled by
one of my competitors,who doesn't want me in there.

Click to expand...

Yes, conspiracy theory #619887687 - in reality it's rubbish, as no one editor has sole control or access to a category.

And please don't tell me that my site does not have a relevant content.

Click to expand...

OK, I won't tell you. Just a generality since while I can guess at where you suggested the site I didn't look. In the Regional branch of the directory, one of the prime requirements is that the site itself states where the site/company/service is located - surprisingly many sites don't (personally I won't deal with a nebulous entity - if there is no place I can physically pin them down to, I just ain't buying it). This is not true so much in the Topical categories where the type of content/service is the important thing.