Would a robots.txt file have anything to do with this in any way?
I don't understand why a perfectly legitimate site which has been fully operational would just be dropped arbitrarily and your organization provides no way whatsoever to look into or resolve such a problem. Mistakes happen in any organization, you really have no system to address errors? Frankly the idea that it would take years to be re listed is enough to really infuriate any reasonable person, I cannot believe someone designed this system with no accountability and no process for correcting errors whatsoever. Is this really how it works, for real?
When you suggested the website you agreed to have read and accepted the guidelines. They explained "In addition, a site's placement in the directory is subject to change or deletion at any time at our sole discretion."
Listed websites are never dropped arbitrarily. There can be several reasons.
- an editor or one of our quality control tools noticed that the site was not accesible, the site will be removed from public view and will be checked later to see if it becam accesible again, if it dies it will relisted
- an editor noticed the site has changed. if it is still lsitable the site is moved to a better category and is now waiting a new review in that category, if the site became non-listable it will be removed
- an editor noticed the site should never have been listed, there was made a mistake during the original review, the site will be removed
- the guidelines changed making the website not-listable under the new guidelines
There is a process of Accountability. But it is between editors. As we do not provide any service to people who suggest websites we are not accountable to them.
Is there anyway to pay to have priority review of our listing and bypass the whole volunteer "whenever I get around to it" problem?
No there is not. And even giving a hint that you are interested in paying might get you and all your sites banned for ever from DMOZ. I do not see your remark as offering us a payment but as a normal question.
I have heard such good things about the DMOZ project and it went so well when we first listed with you, no problems at all. I am all for open source, but DMOZ seems like an organization that has become the very thing it was intended to replace: bureaucratic bungles of inept employees who hide behind red tape and can't help anyone get anything done. Open source was supposed to be about getting things done better, you guys can do better than this.
The Open in DMOZ means that anybody may use our data.
DMOZ is and never has been open for all websites to be listed. And also never will become such a place.