The ODP isn't process-driven; it's activity-driven--a perspective that makes much more sense when a product is formed out of tens of millions of short, independent actions.
An editor reviews a site, and immediately decides what to do: nothing, list it, or suggest it for another review (perhaps with notes). That's it, the process is over.
It starts up all over again for some other editor (or perhaps the same editor later), on some other continent (or perhaps in the next dorm room), at some later time (perhaps only a few milliseconds later), for some other site (or perhaps some other page of the same site).
So there really isn't ever any "status" in the sense of "being somewhere in the process". If a site isn't being looked at right this moment, there's no process acting on it. And it gets more confusing (from the wrong perspective) when you realize nobody can possibly know whether the site is being looked at. In fact, unless the editor happens to be looking at a suggestion, and happens to think it's worthwhile making notes, nobody will ever know the site was looked at.