nuthin Posted October 31, 2002 Posted October 31, 2002 Hello, I was wondering if you's think Dmoz will benefit from a "New" button in categories when new sites are added something like over at Yahoo! I say this because well.. mostly SEO's and Webmasters use the directory to add their sites.. and i really do want to keep track of when sites are getting added.. If there was a "New" button in the cat and topic i submit too means i won't have to browse through all the localties i submit too.. and i can just go check where the New sites have been added.. Whats your opinions on this? You think this would be a good new feature? <img src="/images/icons/wink.gif" alt="" />
dfy Posted October 31, 2002 Posted October 31, 2002 If SEOs always submitted with the correct site title and to the right category, they wouldn't need a "new" button, because they'd know exactly where to look for their sites.
nuthin Posted October 31, 2002 Author Posted October 31, 2002 Hi Yeah i guess you can look at it at that angle.. But when you have over 500 clients to handle their work for it really does get a bit daunting checking to see if their in dmoz.. I mean i personally now label all the cats i submit too in the regional place i submit too but if there was something like a new button then you would know exactly where to go straight away to see if the site was added in that locality.. I just think it would be a good feature of knowing when a cat was last editored too. You'll be happy to know i am one of those SEO's who label their title and description reasonably well and submit to my local regional category properly.. probably why they get in fairly quickly, now days. I just feel it would be a good feature to see at Dmoz.
dfy Posted October 31, 2002 Posted October 31, 2002 I'm not sure it would be useful. We add a hell of a lot more sites than Yahoo does every day, and a 'new' button would probably give you more sites than you can handle. If it were me I would simply use the search tool to look for the site title. If I'd followed the guidelines it would be published as I submitted it, and would show up fine in a search. The reason most people have problems with this method is that they search for keywords instead of titles, and we strip out most keywords from the description. <add> I'm intrigued. You are obviously here 'representing' webfirm.com.au, but equally obviously you didn't write the WebFirm site. What relationship do you have with them? </add>
nuthin Posted October 31, 2002 Author Posted October 31, 2002 Hello I generally don't like to reveal my identity alot when on message boards <img src="/images/icons/smile.gif" alt="" /> I do the SEO work for our web design clients <img src="/images/icons/laugh.gif" alt="" />
totalxsive Posted October 31, 2002 Posted October 31, 2002 Actually, a safer tactic would be to search for the URL, by typing 'u:' followed by part of the URL. So, to search for the site in my profile, I'd type in 'u:neilturner.me.uk'. For more on this, see the DMOZ Search Guide at http://dmoz.org/searchguide.html .
dfy Posted October 31, 2002 Posted October 31, 2002 That of course assumes that the submitter gives us the correct URL, and not a vanity one or a cloaked re-direct, which we will correct for them.
stevesliva Posted November 5, 2002 Posted November 5, 2002 nuthin, I agree that new features allowing submittors to track their submissions would be a great idea, but they would rank very low on the priority list of tasks for the engineering staff. Something like a tracking number, rather than a published "new!" icon... but don't hold your breath.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now