razorblade Posted July 19, 2004 Posted July 19, 2004 I have submitted the site 4 times in the past two years, & it is still not listed. In death and gore. Could any one tell me what the hold up is? woundgallery.com has only been around 5 months & it is already listed. So i know i am not on any type of holding list.
donwiebe Posted July 19, 2004 Posted July 19, 2004 Please read the [thread=396]forum guidelines[/thread] before posting here. We need a clickable link to the dmoz.org category into which the site was submitted.
razorblade Posted July 19, 2004 Author Posted July 19, 2004 http://dmoz.org/Adult/Death_and_Gore/ [snip]
Adolph Posted July 19, 2004 Posted July 19, 2004 I have not been able to find the site through a search. I have seen some names of sites that no longer exist.
senox Posted July 19, 2004 Posted July 19, 2004 The site is awaiting review in this category. Last submission date is yesterday, please respect the delays requested in our forum guidelines. Thanks. If you want to report abuse please read the appropriate threads in http://resource-zone.com/forum/index.php?showforum=12 and follow the instructions. Public abuse allegations are not accepted in this forum, that's why I edited your post. You're welcome to report dead links either in your abuse report or in http://resource-zone.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=11657 (for Adult categories). FYI, this category is less than one year old, and in case you previously submitted your site elsewhere, nobody has touched it yet.
razorblade Posted July 19, 2004 Author Posted July 19, 2004 http://dmoz.org/Adult/Death_and_Gore/ [snip] I followed the rules. I was just stating my case. That sites opened after mine were already up in a days notice. some of those sites are rape sites & scat sites now. I want to know what is going on here.
razorblade Posted July 19, 2004 Author Posted July 19, 2004 The site is awaiting review in this category. Last submission date is yesterday, please respect the delays requested in our forum guidelines. Thanks. If you want to report abuse please read the appropriate threads in http://resource-zone.com/forum/index.php?showforum=12 and follow the instructions. Public abuse allegations are not accepted in this forum, that's why I edited your post. You're welcome to report dead links either in your abuse report or in http://resource-zone.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=11657 (for Adult categories). FYI, this category is less than one year old, and in case you previously submitted your site elsewhere, nobody has touched it yet. are you saying the editor can't keep track of 26 sites? that every one else has to do his job for him. Just make me an editor. i think it is foolish that i have to wait for some bias editor to denigh my site yet again. Then what who do i complain to? google? Because it is obvious that this directory has fallen into game of who has connections instead of what it was intended to do.
Adolph Posted July 19, 2004 Posted July 19, 2004 Actually I think Spooky is correct in his assertions that he should be made an editor. At this point I can not see why he should be denied a position that he is well qualified for and is an expert on the subject matter. There are more sites that should be listed in the genre and some of them removed because content has changed dramatically.
senox Posted July 19, 2004 Posted July 19, 2004 Spooky, please cool down or stop posting. If you have something constructive to contribute then you're welcome to do so and we'll have a look at it. If you just want to rant then the discussion is over. Your call.
Adolph Posted July 20, 2004 Posted July 20, 2004 Takes a very long time to get a response back to a question. What is being done on this subject matter?
senox Posted July 20, 2004 Posted July 20, 2004 What question and what subject matter? Status has been given, links/information on how to report abuse and bad links were provided, and the rant was ignored.
Adolph Posted July 20, 2004 Posted July 20, 2004 Spooky asked if the editor was not capable of doing his job and he also asked why his application was rejected. It was also asked why other sites have been added and http://www.lifeofdebauchery has not.
senox Posted July 21, 2004 Posted July 21, 2004 Spooky asked We consider this a rant, and rants are, in the best case for the forum member, just ignored. if the editor was not capable of doing his job So far no whatsoever evidence has been presented that this is the case. The proper channels to report abuse have been pointed out, and all reports filed are investigated. This is not an instant process, and the results are not communicated, although they may or may not be visible in the directory one day. Bad links and content changes can also be reported, either within an abuse report, or in the thread I pointed out to you, or by using the 'Update URL' link in the category where the links can be found. Now if you don't want to use any of these possibilities offered then don't complain that nothing is happening. FYI, editors are volunteers, not unpaid servants to submitters, and inactivity is not abuse. why his application was rejected So far I haven't read anything about an ongoing application to become an editor. In case you mean the site status, it's 'awaiting review', not rejected. It was also asked why other sites have been added Because the site we're talking about here hasn't been reviewed yet, therefore no whatsoever decision has been taken. That's not much of a suprise since the last submission is less than one week old. There are more sites that should be listed in the genre You're more than welcome to suggest them. Suggesting sites is open to everybody.
Recommended Posts