Meta hutcheson Posted August 30, 2004 Meta Posted August 30, 2004 No, it would merely establish that the second submittal was not just spam but maliciously devious spam.
jjwill Posted August 30, 2004 Posted August 30, 2004 One company, one website. When you've got 100,000 people working for you, like GM, we can think about two websites. Until then, your figures just show that the ration is 50,000 people per website -- and you don't have enough people for the first one. You don't want to go there. Our rules work better for you than your proposal does. Under your proposal, you should get no listings. Under ours, you'll be considered for one. crooner, It looks like you're going in circles.
Crooner Posted August 30, 2004 Author Posted August 30, 2004 Dear luggagebase, You got that right - shame specific questions are not answered by people making statements to the contrary.
motsa Posted August 30, 2004 Posted August 30, 2004 OK, I'm putting a stop to this now. Please keep in mind that discussions of why a site isn't acceptable are not appropriate for this forum and you've had more responses than you should have from editors regarding your site in particular. This discussion has run its course. I'm closing this thread -- do not start up another thread about it.
Recommended Posts