Guest zigx Posted April 21, 2003 Posted April 21, 2003 Hi! I run a directory (one i hand edit... mini dmoz hehe) that lists nonnude sites. although these sites are not nude, they are still considered Adult, so i felt it was correct to place the link in the adult section of dmoz. I submitted here: http://dmoz.org/Adult/Computers/Internet/Searching/Link_Sites/Free/ The thing im worried about is that technically there is a nonnude section on dmoz, but its only for Image Galleries ( http://dmoz.org/Adult/Image_Galleries/Softcore/Non-Nudes/ ) so im a little unsure if i submitted to the correct area. Any suggestions would be GREAT! thanks guys
Meta Jezebel Posted April 28, 2003 Meta Posted April 28, 2003 Sorry - we must have overlooked your post. <img src="/images/icons/ooo.gif" alt="" /> Your site looks to be appropriately submitted. It's waiting to be reviewed with a fairly large number of other sites. Please be patient, and we'll get to your submission as soon as we can. Hope that helps. <img src="/images/icons/smirk.gif" alt="" />
Guest zigx Posted May 24, 2003 Posted May 24, 2003 i was wondering if you could please check again. I would really appreciate it, its been over 2 months now and i dunno if that is long enough?? Thanx! <img src="/images/icons/grin.gif" alt="" />
brmehlman Posted July 10, 2003 Posted July 10, 2003 Still awaiting review in the category to which it was submitted. Please be patient, we've got a lot of sites to review and (nudge, hint, wink) too few editors willing and able to review Adult sites.
Guest zigx Posted July 12, 2003 Posted July 12, 2003 This is a little off subject, but can an editor ONLY edit the category that he is assigned, or can all editors review any category, but are responsible for the quality of the cat they mod?
brmehlman Posted July 12, 2003 Posted July 12, 2003 Like many apparently simple questions, this one has a moderately complex answer. Most editors can edit in, and are responsible for the quality of, the categories they are named on and all subcategories of those. Some of us (insert immodest cough here) can edit almost anywhere in the directory. I'd also like to point out that being affiliated with a listed or potentially listed site is by no means a bar to becoming an editor. For an example apropos here, some of our best Adult editors are Adult webmasters. But, and I cannot emphasize this too strongly, you must be completely open about your affiliations, and we need to be completely certain that you will treat your competitors fairly and give yourself no advantage.
Guest zigx Posted August 11, 2003 Posted August 11, 2003 would you mind checking again? its been another month.
senox Posted August 11, 2003 Posted August 11, 2003 Nothing new, unfortunately. It's still there awaiting review.
Guest zigx Posted August 13, 2003 Posted August 13, 2003 lol damn oh well, thanks for the help! i dunno if this is possible, but can you see if there has been any change at all in the list?
Meta windharp Posted October 31, 2003 Meta Posted October 31, 2003 No change yet, sorry. Curlie Meta/kMeta Editor windharp
Guest zigx Posted November 17, 2003 Posted November 17, 2003 hey can someone let me know the status please
Meta windharp Posted November 17, 2003 Meta Posted November 17, 2003 The "please leave at least a month between status requests" rule applies in this forum too, to save us some time. Thank you. Curlie Meta/kMeta Editor windharp
Guest zigx Posted December 12, 2003 Posted December 12, 2003 k its been a month and 12 days... any luck now? thanks guys!
Guest zigx Posted January 26, 2004 Posted January 26, 2004 Could i please have an update on this. Thanks!
brmehlman Posted January 26, 2004 Posted January 26, 2004 We have decided not to list this site. Please refer to the Adult FAQ for details about what we list and what we don't.
Guest zigx Posted January 30, 2004 Posted January 30, 2004 We have decided not to list this site. Please refer to the Adult FAQ for details about what we list and what we don't. oh man! was there any info stating why? ive looked over the link that you gave me...and i cant find where my site breaks the rules.
brmehlman Posted January 30, 2004 Posted January 30, 2004 I'm afraid we've been forced to stop giving out that sort of information. I wish we could, but far too many people used a simple statement of why we didn't list a site as a starting point for some pretty abusive arguments.
Guest zigx Posted February 6, 2004 Posted February 6, 2004 Ok that is fair and also would help someone trying to spam. Do you have any suggestions for me? im really confused as to what i should do about this because i was thinking that i was in the clear! :confused: I'm afraid we've been forced to stop giving out that sort of information. I wish we could, but far too many people used a simple statement of why we didn't list a site as a starting point for some pretty abusive arguments.
Recommended Posts