Advise on disapproved application

[motsa]

It seems that every category is tricky to edit? Then why should volunteer be needed?

Well, look at your posts in this thread about the comments you've received on your rejections. In general, you seem to be picking wrong sites for the categories that you're applying for. If you don't understand the scope of the category you're applying for, then you're going to get rejected. Things like Directories, Chats and Forums, News and Media, etc. aren't always easy things for new editors to understand. Try picking something straight forward, where it's obvious what type of sites belong there.

[motsa]

Could the reviewing meta please step forward to advise here?

That's unlikely to happen. Had the reviewing metas of any of your applications wanted to enter into a dialogue with you, you would have their contact details.

[pvgool]

A little tip.

You said you know much about soccor.

My guess is you will even know more about soccer in the country you live in.

Why not start finding that country through http://dmoz.org/Sports/Soccer/By_Country/ or maybe start in http://dmoz.org/Sports/Soccer/Players/ which are also listed by country.

Tip 2: go for a category with 50 or less sites listed.

[andysg]

Thanks for the suggestion.

 

I like http://dmoz.org/Sports/Soccer/AFC/Singapore/ because it represent my country.

[motsa]

Seems like a fairly straight forward category, although keep in mind that betting and gambling related sites don't belong there.

[oneeye]

29 sites - looks quite reasonable to me. Make sure, since you seem to have a problem with classifying sites into the right category, that you are careful there - there are 2 sub-categories included. If an example belongs in one of those then say so.

[andysg]

I'll always be cautious when reviewing sites on that category and would not hesitate to seek advice from meta or other senior editors when neccessary.