status: http://www.thumbnail-pictures.net/

[Guest vitare]

Status of http://www.thumbnail-pictures.net/ submitted to:

 

http://dmoz.org/Computers/Usenet/Web_Based/

[dfy]

I don't see your site in the queue, nor is there any indication that it ever has been. It looks like you need to re-submit. Before you do, please read the category submission guidelines to make sure that your site really does fit in there.

[Guest vitare]

Now I'm starting to wonder if I submitted elsewhere. Was it in a queue for:

 

http://dmoz.org/Computers/Graphics/Clip_Art/Pictures/

 

or

 

http://dmoz.org/Recreation/Travel/Image_Galleries/

[motsa]

Nope, not there. Look, if you don't remember where you submitted, we can't be expected to go hunting in places you think you might have submitted. Just carefully look through the directory and pick the one category best suited to your site (note: that wouldn't be Recreation/Travel/Image_Galleries or Computers/Usenet/Web_Based) and resubmit it there. Then you can come back to this thread a month or more after you resubmit it to ask for a status check.

[Guest vitare]

The categories listed are the ones I would have most definitely submitted to. Sorry if it seemed like a wild goose chase :-)

 

So it doesn't appear that I EVER submitted to any of those categories, or that I'm just not shown in any active queue? I ask cuz I'd like to know if there was something to fix.

[motsa]

You're not showing up as waiting in any of those categories nor has the site been touched by an editor. Did you get an error message when you submitted?

[Guest vitare]

OK yesterday I re-submitted to:

 

http://dmoz.org/Computers/Graphics/Clip_Art/Pictures/

 

with no errors; the response webpage came up saying it was submitted. Is it in the queue now?

[Guest acropelius]

Good news and bad news.

 

Good news: Your site submission did go through this time.

Bad news: Submission was denied for having many uncensored adult images.

 

Will have to get rid of the adult content or submit to the Adult/ side of the directory.

 

Might also want to "read" the submission guidelines on "title" and "descriptions".

 

Title "must" be the name of the site.

Descriptions "should not" contain any advertising/hype. Both guidelines were ignored.

[Guest vitare]

I understand why rejected due to it containing (but not being entirely about) adult content, but did not understand why rejected on your last two points.

 

The title I used was Thumbnail-Pictures.net which is the name of the site (unless you see otherwise?) and the description I thought was pretty bland -- I didn't include anything like THE BEST or WORLD'S GREATEST -- it was just what I thought best described it and I even added that it was a pay site (which many sites don't include).

 

Thanks for checking on it though and I'll re-read the guidelines to see what I missed (I really did read them first :-)

[motsa]

It wasn't rejected because of those two points (since we will just correct any submitted titles and descriptions that don't meet our guidelines). Those were, I believe, just noted as an aside.