janhvizdak Posted October 21, 2007 Posted October 21, 2007 Is it OK to list a site which uses any kind of unfair techniques for improving it's rankings in search engines? I am talking about customarmoring.com which uses hidden links and hidden text at the bottom of it's pages. The site is listed here: http://www.dmoz.org/Business/Business_Services/Fire_and_Security/Security/Armored_Vehicles/
gimmster Posted October 21, 2007 Posted October 21, 2007 Yes. We aren't a search engine. We list sites based on the unique content visible to a human. *However* hidden text and links may be part of considering a sites veracity and also an indicator that the content needs to be checked in much more depth to ensure it is unique. Bottom line: Hidden text and or links are not the sole reason to not list a site. Our guidelines on this are at http://www.dmoz.org/guidelines/include.html see the sections on Is it easy to assess the site's trustworthiness? and Spider Food, Lead Generators and Content Mills for the more relevant sections.
Meta informator Posted October 21, 2007 Meta Posted October 21, 2007 As an editor janhvizdak, you have of course already read the Guidelines. In the future you can always ask internally regarding questions concerning listability... Curlie (Dmoz) Meta editor informator
janhvizdak Posted October 21, 2007 Author Posted October 21, 2007 Yeah, of course, I understand. It was just about the ethical point of view...
blackhatseo Posted January 13, 2008 Posted January 13, 2008 Black Hat Is it OK to list a site which uses any kind of unfair techniques for improving it's rankings in search engines? I am talking about customarmoring.com which uses hidden links and hidden text at the bottom of it's pages. The site is listed here: http://www.dmoz.org/Business/Business_Services/Fire_and_Security/Security/Armored_Vehicles/ I don't think so, Ive submitted 2 black hat seo websites before and they both got rejected, even though both sites were not using any black hat seo techniques themselves they were just giving information about it,, lets hope its third time lucky and my new site http://Removed URL will pass !
spectregunner Posted January 14, 2008 Posted January 14, 2008 they were just giving information about it We would not decline to list a site for that reason alone.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now