Jump to content

am i going to get rejected


Recommended Posts

Posted

i applied to be an editor in Regional/NorthAmerica/UnitedStates/Massachusetts/Localities/P/Peabody/ and the 3 web sites i suggested 2 had to do with

the internet and the other was a resturaunt that belong in the catagories like business and the other one in entertainment actually the 2 could go in comuters/ or internet some where too but are headquartered in peabody

anyway am I going to get rejected because they specifically

belong in like peabody/business or did applyng for peabody cover whats under it <img src="/images/icons/frown.gif" alt="" />

  • Meta
Posted

As to whether you will be rejected, I cannot say.

 

As to whether permission to edit "Elbonia" includes its subcategories: yes, it does. And sites that should go in subcategories are acceptable. Two caveats:

 

Often, categories with subcategories will be considered too large for a beginning editor. This may not be true for a small town -- with maybe 10 sites, and two subcategories simply because there is a @link farm at the state level.

 

If you suggest sites for subcats, note which subcat you think they belong in -- this will tell the meta-editor that you understand what you were doing.

Posted
nevermind my attempt has been in vain i have been rejected <img src="/images/icons/frown.gif" alt="" />
Posted
I have not seen your editor application (those are only dealt with by Metas) but I can see several obvious reasons that you may have been rejected for, purely from reading what you have written here; and it has nothing to do with the sites that you submitted. There may be other factors involved of which I am not aware, but I think that most current editors will spot what the problems are very quickly.
Posted
could you tell me what they are <img src="/images/icons/confused.gif" alt="" />
Posted

i applied

i suggested

resturaunt

that belong

catagories

in entertainment actually the

comuters/ or internet

some where

peabody

in like peabody/business

applyng

whats under it

 

Spelling, punctuation, and grammar.

Posted
you got me their. well thanks for the quick reply on the application anyways it took like 15min <img src="/images/icons/smirk.gif" alt="" />
Posted

> am i going to get rejected

 

Very likely.

 

 

 

 

This does you no favours at all (posted after gimmster gave you big hints as to the problem):

 

>> you got me their. well thanks for the quick reply on the application anyways it took like 15min <<

 

In your four posts, so far, you have used a total of _ONE_ full stop, asked three questions all without question marks, and the only capital letters you have used are the ones that you cut and pasted for the category name of where you submitted. If you did this to any sites that you reviewed for the ODP as an editor, you would be crucified not just by the other editors, but by the submitters as well. I am sorry if this is a bit harsh. Every single site edit done on the ODP is logged, so it does not take very long to trace back and find out who is responsible for what.

 

 

 

See also:

http://www.resource-zone.com/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=status&Number=3634 and http://www.resource-zone.com/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=submissions&Number=6122.

Posted
what a way to beat a dead horse giz anybody have any more shots <img src="/images/icons/mad.gif" alt="" />
Posted

Like everyone else, I don't know why your specific application was rejected, but I'd like to offer some (hopefully) constructive suggestions.

 

Since it sounds like most of the sites you suggested would fit in .../Peabody/Business_and_Economy, which is a small enough category (with some potential, and with no subcats), why don't you try applying for that? You might want to try writing the descriptions in a word processing program, so you can use the spell-check function (and grammar checker, if there is one) before pasting them into the application form. And don't forget to look over the Editing Guidelines; good style and content is likely to make a big difference.

Guest alnilam
Posted
The Open Directory relies on its editors to have good spelling and grammar. If this isn't one of your stronger points, than I reccomend that you consider a different project to work on. I don't mean to be pointed, that's just what the guidelines state, and they are written by the staff and the metas.
  • Meta
Posted
what a way to beat a dead horse

 

A decision regarding your editor status is never final.

 

Even if you have been rejected, you can still reapply and try again, if you're willing to take constructive critics to the heart and improve your editing. :-)

 

Due to the fact that decisions aren't final, I won't call anybody a "dead horse" <img src="/images/icons/smile.gif" alt="" />

Posted

I thank you all for you criticism it has been a learning experience.And I will work on my grammar an little more

and try again in a couple of months.many thanks for the textual tongue lashing

<img src="/images/icons/smile.gif" alt="" />

Guest alnilam
Posted

See? You're doing better already. <img src="/images/icons/laugh.gif" alt="" />

 

Still needs a bit of work but... Better. <img src="/images/icons/crazy.gif" alt="" />

Posted

I thank lachenm and the rest for beingh positive about being an editor (even though i cant type worth @#*&@#)

so lets move on and stop taking up disk space <img src="/images/icons/smile.gif" alt="" />

Posted
Dammm!!!! <img src="/images/icons/mad.gif" alt="" /> I forgot to use my text editor.(AAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...