Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Rejected for being too much under construction when you submitted it. If you have added more content to the various broken sections now then you may resubmit.
Posted

Hi,

Yes, the site has more info and more pages, the bad links have been fixed (:mad: they're due to a bug with Mozilla which insists on changing links when you save the page... any solutions to that?) and it's going to keep on growing. We just resubmitted it to

Top: Regional: Europe: France: Guides and Directories

which is probably more appropriate as it contains not just travel info, but info on wine, studying, French links, and we're working on plenty more.

  • 1 month later...
Posted
As suggested by John Caius, I resubmitted this site on 19th November, now that it has more content (and a lot more than lots of the sites in DMOZ). Can anyone give me an update on its status....
Posted
I have moved your site to the unreviewed queue of the Travel Guides category as I agree that it's more appropriately placed there. Looking at your site, something that might cause an editor to query the source of your content is the fact that many of the 'Cliquez Ici' links on the site lead to content on different domains, whilst other 'Cliquez Ici' links lead to other pages on your domain. What is your relationship with those other sites you link to? There's not that much content that's actually held on your domain.
Posted

Thanks John

But with regard to "many of the 'Cliquez Ici' links on the site lead to content on different domains".... this is true of millions of sites on the Internet, notably portals whose aim is to group together (very selectively) links to relevant websites (is that not what DMOZ does?). It is the careful selection of these links that is the value of such sites. As regards "original pages", there are several of these, and more are in the pipeline... even if one can question whether 'tis better to include a short "own page" on a subject, or to include a link to a longer, and often more authoritative page, on the same subject. I don't really think that we can do better, for instance, for maps of France than map companies can, hence the links from our site rather than an "own page"

  • Meta
Posted
is that not what DMOZ does?

Yes. And because of this fact, the benefit of listing such sites in thr ODP is very small. So we are quite restrictive regarding such sites. If we think they don't add valuable content, we dont list them.

 

Our guidelines ask us to list sites that have their own, unique content.

Curlie Meta/kMeta Editor windharp

 

d9aaee9797988d021d7c863cef1d0327.gif

Posted

The site in question contains plenty of original content and corresponds in all respects to the guidelines:

"In general, ODP editors should enter sites that represent the following:

* Original, unique and valuable informational content that contributes something unique to the category's subject."

It also fully complies with the 5 points then indicated in the guidelines under the heading :

"Editors should consider the following for each site: "

I can't see anywhere in the guidelines that a site that contains a mix of original content and links cannot be listed.

Or do the words "such sites" in the preceeding post refer to directories like Dmoz, and not to the site I submitted?

Posted
As stated in the forum guidelines, we casn not enter into discussions or debates about the suitability of sites, nor exact reason why it was rejected. Sorry.
Posted

This thread currently shows up with the message "this thread has moved", with my member name against the thread. :confused:

Please can someone explain a) What is the significance of this?

b) Why does my name appear along side the message, since I did not move it?

Puzzled!

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 months later...
Posted

The site still awaits editorial review in that category.

 

And no, we are unable to give any information about when a particular site will be listed, as our Crystal Ball interface (Microsoft ActiveScry) has been affected by the Sasser worm and is currently informing us that Manchester United will win the next Superbowl. (For a more serious answer to that question, please see http://resource-zone.com/forum/faq.php?faq=odp#faq_how_long )

 

Merci

  • 5 months later...
Posted

No updates for over a year and a half !!

 

Seriously, editors!

I just found this message added to the bottom of a major UK directory that uses results from DMOZ/

* ! To The Editors Of Regional/Europe And Its Subcategories - Please do not wait to long with reviewing suggested sites and keep the number of queued sites as low as possible.

 

Category editors: indianpipe igor07 kevinb randyescalada

Last Update: 24 Mar, 2003 18:04 :eek:

This is at the bottom of:

http://www.mirago.co.uk/scripts/dir.aspx?cat=Top/Regional/Europe...

 

Well, if no ODP editor has edited a vast regional category such as Regional/Europe for over a year and a half, is there really any point in submitting to Dmoz at all??

Let's be fair and honest, this does NOT suggest that "humans do it best"... It would seem that neither humans nor machines are doing it at all in this case.

 

I see that the category to which I submitted my site still has no editor.

I still remain in hope that one day, the site I submittted will get listed.

Cheers, Lauvergnat

×
×
  • Create New...