Mistakes are made. Sites change content over the years. That's why we invite people to report such issues when they find them.Why those site were listed in that category? Are they appropriate?
There can only be one reason to become an editor: To help DMOZ grow in both quality and quantity.Please consider the motto of an application while reviewing an application. In the present application format there is no such method. Try to develop a form which can give you a clear understanding to understand the motto of an application.
I have no clue what you're saying here, and I can assure you that my English is native and fluent.Please consider the motto of an application while reviewing an application. In the present application format there is no such method. Try to develop a form which can give you a clear understanding to understand the motto of an application.
My application has been rejected again. This time it is rejected for improper description. The editor says that my description looks like opinionated critiques or listing justifications. I was written the description to describe why I like those sites. Also I found in the comment that I have only one chance more. I am confused that how to write description. Is DMOZ decided not to approve me as an editor? Do not mind I am frustrated.We can give you no more help.
An application must be done by you as we want to see who you are and what you can do.
Did you read the thread FAQ and General Advice
An application must be (these are only general comments)
- honest (who are you, what have you done in the past, why do you want to become editor, with which sites are you affiliated)
- complete (don't try to hide any of the above mentioned information, answer all questions)
- provide (preferably) 3 example websites that could be listed in the category (they should not be listed yet), and write decent titles and descriptions (we are not looking for perfection but if you do understand the guidelines)
- write an application with proper use of the language (spelling and grammar) - again we are not looking for perfection as we all sometimes make mistakes but it must be good - that is why we encourage people to start in their mother language and not in a foreign one
Why you like those sites is an opinion. And we do not accept such descriptions.This time it is rejected for improper description. The editor says that my description looks like opinionated critiques or listing justifications. I was written the description to describe why I like those sites.
Sometimes people do apply many times without showing any imporvement in their applications. In such cases it can happen that meta editors ask him/her not to apply again. You have been given a lot of advise, both here and in the emails your received after the applicatiosn were rejected. If you are not able to understand that advise and the guidelines to produce a decent application it might be better not to become an editor. It is nothing personal. It is just that a person (in this case you) and DMOZ do not match.Also I found in the comment that I have only one chance more. I am confused that how to write description. Is DMOZ decided not to approve me as an editor?
pvgool was kind enough to point you at our editor guidelines, as several application reviewers have previously done. For your final attempt, be sure to actually read them first and also re-read the reviewer comments on your most recent applications.
So far, despite repeated advice, you've either chosen to ignore them or you didn't understand the advice. The latter could well be correct because motsa and I have previously told you that we don't think your English language skills are up to editing an English language category.
In either circumstance, it's a waste of your and our efforts to persist in this. That's why you've been given one last chance. Don't waste it