>you will find the answers you are looking for by...reading through the guidelines<
This is what I found: "The ODP Guidelines apply to every branch and category of the directory. Editors in some top level branches of the ODP have created their own set of guidelines that are meant to complement these general directory-wide guidelines. Category guidelines provide instructions for handing unique taxonomy and ontology issues relevant to the category's subject area."
Obviously the top editors "created their own set of guidelines that are meant to complement these general directory-wide guidelines" when they decided to set the structure for Alternative Medicine. The same can and should be done for the category Christianity.
>The simplest way to explain this that I have come up with is this: Christianity is a Religion. Religions go in the category Religion. The category Religion is in the category Society and Culture. It makes sense. There is no "judgement" going on here.<
As with the Alternative Medicine example, I am not suggesting otherwise - just the same addition to the second tier.
>Also, I have to reinforce my earlier comment - the sheer volume of sites listed in Christianity means that there are a number of dedicated ODP editors seeking out sites and adding them at a furious rate.<
And I will repeat: "And believe me, I appreciate those editors, but the reason that they must work so hard is because of the shear size and demand for the volume of sites within the Christianity category. For this reason I would think that it ranks a high tier placing."
>I'm not sure why you think that the listing of "Alternative" as a direct access link on the home page under "Health" has anything to do with the non-listing of "Christianity" under "Society".<
If you do not even understand what I am discussing why are you even commenting?
>To answer your million dollar question, Axacta, size doesn't matter when we decide where to place categories.<
I find that hard to believe when deciding what appears on the Home Page. Are you speaking from experience? Are you part of the decision-making for the Home Page?
>The number of sites in a category has nothing to do with popularity in regards to the visitors to ODP. It is the enthusiasm of the editors adding sites to a category.<
Please... Do you honestly believe there are 61,000 sites for just a handful of visitors?
>ODP is not a pyramid structure, if anything it is more of an umbrella. Sub-categories fit "under" a more general category.<
You just described a pyramid structure.
>There are numerous examples where sub-categories out number the parent category, but it does not justify making them independent of the parent.<
Then explain Alternative Medicine.
>Music with over 100,000 sites still fits "under" Arts. Bands and Artists with over 46,000 sites still fits under Music. So Christianity fits "under" Religion regardless of how many sites it has.<
Again, explain Alternative Medicine.
>Medicine and Alternative Medicine co-exist on an equal tier just as Christianity co-exists with Agnosticism. Each are different means to the same end. One is finding Health, the other is finding Spirituality. Putting Christianity on a tier with Religion would be the same as putting Alternative Medicine on a tier with Health.<
No, it would be the same as putting Alternative Medicine on a tier with Medicine, which is the case. The only difference would be to rename Religion to Alternate Religions.
>What you are suggesting, to follow it out logically, means we would also move Catholicism out from Denominations. Since Denominations has 42,000+ sites and Catholicism contains 22,000+ sites which far out numbers all the other "types" of Christianity. Doing this in no ways follows the entire directory layout.<
42,000 compared with 22,000 is hardly the same as comparing 61,000 with 9.
>I hope this helps in understanding how ODP currently organizes its categories.<
Because you have not even attempted to explain the Alternative Medicine situation I doubt that you have any direct knowledge of how the top two tiers were selected and structured.
==========================
I find it interesting that those of you who have responded within this thread are defensively reactionary in your comments. It is as though I have had the audacity to point that the emperor has no clothes. But even though your reaction is such, I do not even believe that this so threatens the structure of ODP, as seems your reactions indicate that you believe. I am simply making a presentational suggestion based on the numbers and the precedent of Alternative Medicine. What is so threatening about that?
Many of you are making statements as though you have first hand knowledge of the decisions made for the Home Page. I doubt that is true for most, if not all of you. From now on I ask that you identify your experience related to the Alternative Medicine situation. If you have no first hand experience it is only fair that your comments be identified as nothing more than your own conjecture. Is there anyone who can speak to this from first hand experience, or are all of you just lesser editors that have nothing to do with the top two tier structure and how Alternative Medicine was placed within that structure? Again I am asking for nothing different than the situation regarding Alternative Medicine. Please deal with why this cannot apply to Christianity. Almost everything that I have had to deal with since my last post was already dealt with in previous posts. Please stick to the issue of explaining the structural arrangement for Alternative Medicine and why it cannot be equally applied to Christianity, which by the numbers, deserves it even more.
This is what I found: "The ODP Guidelines apply to every branch and category of the directory. Editors in some top level branches of the ODP have created their own set of guidelines that are meant to complement these general directory-wide guidelines. Category guidelines provide instructions for handing unique taxonomy and ontology issues relevant to the category's subject area."
Obviously the top editors "created their own set of guidelines that are meant to complement these general directory-wide guidelines" when they decided to set the structure for Alternative Medicine. The same can and should be done for the category Christianity.
>The simplest way to explain this that I have come up with is this: Christianity is a Religion. Religions go in the category Religion. The category Religion is in the category Society and Culture. It makes sense. There is no "judgement" going on here.<
As with the Alternative Medicine example, I am not suggesting otherwise - just the same addition to the second tier.
>Also, I have to reinforce my earlier comment - the sheer volume of sites listed in Christianity means that there are a number of dedicated ODP editors seeking out sites and adding them at a furious rate.<
And I will repeat: "And believe me, I appreciate those editors, but the reason that they must work so hard is because of the shear size and demand for the volume of sites within the Christianity category. For this reason I would think that it ranks a high tier placing."
>I'm not sure why you think that the listing of "Alternative" as a direct access link on the home page under "Health" has anything to do with the non-listing of "Christianity" under "Society".<
If you do not even understand what I am discussing why are you even commenting?
>To answer your million dollar question, Axacta, size doesn't matter when we decide where to place categories.<
I find that hard to believe when deciding what appears on the Home Page. Are you speaking from experience? Are you part of the decision-making for the Home Page?
>The number of sites in a category has nothing to do with popularity in regards to the visitors to ODP. It is the enthusiasm of the editors adding sites to a category.<
Please... Do you honestly believe there are 61,000 sites for just a handful of visitors?
>ODP is not a pyramid structure, if anything it is more of an umbrella. Sub-categories fit "under" a more general category.<
You just described a pyramid structure.
>There are numerous examples where sub-categories out number the parent category, but it does not justify making them independent of the parent.<
Then explain Alternative Medicine.
>Music with over 100,000 sites still fits "under" Arts. Bands and Artists with over 46,000 sites still fits under Music. So Christianity fits "under" Religion regardless of how many sites it has.<
Again, explain Alternative Medicine.
>Medicine and Alternative Medicine co-exist on an equal tier just as Christianity co-exists with Agnosticism. Each are different means to the same end. One is finding Health, the other is finding Spirituality. Putting Christianity on a tier with Religion would be the same as putting Alternative Medicine on a tier with Health.<
No, it would be the same as putting Alternative Medicine on a tier with Medicine, which is the case. The only difference would be to rename Religion to Alternate Religions.
>What you are suggesting, to follow it out logically, means we would also move Catholicism out from Denominations. Since Denominations has 42,000+ sites and Catholicism contains 22,000+ sites which far out numbers all the other "types" of Christianity. Doing this in no ways follows the entire directory layout.<
42,000 compared with 22,000 is hardly the same as comparing 61,000 with 9.
>I hope this helps in understanding how ODP currently organizes its categories.<
Because you have not even attempted to explain the Alternative Medicine situation I doubt that you have any direct knowledge of how the top two tiers were selected and structured.
==========================
I find it interesting that those of you who have responded within this thread are defensively reactionary in your comments. It is as though I have had the audacity to point that the emperor has no clothes. But even though your reaction is such, I do not even believe that this so threatens the structure of ODP, as seems your reactions indicate that you believe. I am simply making a presentational suggestion based on the numbers and the precedent of Alternative Medicine. What is so threatening about that?
Many of you are making statements as though you have first hand knowledge of the decisions made for the Home Page. I doubt that is true for most, if not all of you. From now on I ask that you identify your experience related to the Alternative Medicine situation. If you have no first hand experience it is only fair that your comments be identified as nothing more than your own conjecture. Is there anyone who can speak to this from first hand experience, or are all of you just lesser editors that have nothing to do with the top two tier structure and how Alternative Medicine was placed within that structure? Again I am asking for nothing different than the situation regarding Alternative Medicine. Please deal with why this cannot apply to Christianity. Almost everything that I have had to deal with since my last post was already dealt with in previous posts. Please stick to the issue of explaining the structural arrangement for Alternative Medicine and why it cannot be equally applied to Christianity, which by the numbers, deserves it even more.