Re: Hijacks & Other Content Changes - Report Here
Thank you very much for your rapid action. This gives me the strength to continue helping the DMOZ abusers "stuffing" project.
On the other hand the lack of response in my above post #63928 has made me think that I have not given enough evidence to support my statement. I hope it is OK to enhance my statement with the following:
In
http://www.dmoz.org/Business/Small_Business/Home_Office/
We have:
1. Work at Home Club (http://workathomeclub.com/) - Information and resources for the work at home entrepreneur.
In this page we can see about 40 links. 20 of them are pointing directly to Clickbank products with Clickbank affiliate Ids. Of the rest 20 links 10 are pointing to inner pages: Business, Debts, Opportunities, …, Investments. Each of these pages is also full of Clickbank products.
This leaves us with only 10 links, 4-5 of them pointing to other sites (probably owned by the same person) and the rest links are pages with no content (contact, privacy policy, terms, etc) except one titled: “Articles”.
This one is the only page that leads to some content. However, all these articles are written by other webmasters and we can find them in the original sites and in a lot of other web sites. If I remember correctly, I have seen posts in the past that having a database of articles written by other webmasters and no authentic content is a very well reason for your site to be rejected by DMOZ.
2. Biz whiz (http://biz-whiz.com/) - A community website for work from home business. It contains information, tools and resources to help any home based business.
This is a tougher one because this webmaster tries (almost successfully) to hide his affiliations. He does that by avoiding to link directly to his affiliate pages and at first glance it appears that he has no affiliate links. A more careful examination reveals the following:
Firstly, the first link throughout the whole site is titled: “Recommended Home Business” and it links to an article. An article? Not exactly! The “article” consists of SFI sales pitch and registration form. In this way it does not look like an affiliate link and this webmaster could get away with it by a not careful reviewer.
Is that all? Of course not! The first of the most prominent “Work at Home Links” also points to the same “article”
The third link points to another “article” that is full of affiliate links and banners of CJ and Clickbank. Most of them are hidden with the “mouse over” technique.
The fourth link points to another “article” The situation is the same as above. (third “article”).
What is left? A content management system (open source PHP nuke that has been modified and that is sold probably illegally – but this could or could not be an issue for ODP) and a bunch of articles written by other webmasters. These articles are available in the original sites, and in a lot of other web sites.
In addition, in almost all of these not owned articles, this webmaster ads his sales pitch as an Editor note. Something like: “ Publisher's Note : After evaluating several home business opportunities, View why we recommend the SFI Home Business that is free to join.” or something similar. The rest of the site is a bunch of links to other sites, a result of the abused in our days “front page link exchange” method.
Do the above sites have real authentic content? No way! Both of them have one and only one reason: to promote their affiliate links. I hope I have managed to show you some of the dodgy methods these webmasters use to hide their affiliations.
PS: I apologize for the length of my post.