glynos63 said:
Hi, I'm new in this forum, and I'm new in this business, so please forgive me if I blunder. I've read the FAQ but can't seem to find directions how to deal with this. That's why I try here.
I've recently been hired for SEO work related to the above sites. glynos63 seems to suggest that there is something not correct with them. He's right that they belong to the same company, but in it self that cannot be a problem, can it? The sites have different content and represent the different services that this company offers.
Kavi.gr is a general Greek tourism website offering packages to tourists, focusing on group arrangements.
Greekhotels.gr is a directory of hotels in Greece.
Greece-ferries.com provides information about the Greek islands and how to get there by ferry (basically the only way to get to most of the islands).
Greekferries.gr provides information about the international ferry lines between Italy and Greece, with online reservation possibility.
Eco.gr is the holding company's (Ecoworld S.A.) website with company and contact information. It's a Greek thing, don't ask...
These last 2 have never been in the DMOZ as far as I can determine.
I'm not totally sure how the system works, being a newbie, but what strikes me is that glynos63 comes in on June 16th, hangs around for 4 months and then completely disappears (since October 11th, 2005). In those 4 months he takes it upon himself to "clean out" the Greek section? Could we have become the victim of an over-zealous member with possibly a dose of self-interest (see his posting in
http://resource-zone.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=39908)?
If we have broken the ODP guidelines, I accept being kicked out of the dmoz for those sites (only kavi.gr remains now). But they _are_ different sites, they provide a different service and they cater for a different public, so I think they deserve an individual listing. Just because glynos63 is of the opinion that 1 site should contain _all_ the services of a given company and goes on a crusade to get the infidels banned, it doesn't mean that he is right. Would you ban
www.live.com,
www.hotmail.com,
www.msn.com from the directory because they all belong to microsoft.com? I rest my case in the editors' hands...
With best regards,
photis