Status of http://rosenzweig.info

P

prosenzweig

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2004
Messages
22
Update

Please let me know if if my request to get rosenzweig.info listed has been received and is being processed. Thanks a lot for your time and reply.

Regards,
Peter
 
P

prosenzweig

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2004
Messages
22
Please let me know if if my request to get rosenzweig.info listed has been received and is being processed. Thanks a lot for your time and reply.

Regards,
Peter
 
dogbows

dogbows

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2004
Messages
2,446
Peter, I am sorry if this sounds a little picky, but forum guidelines require that you wait a minimum of 30 days from your latest, not first, submission before asking for status. However, in order to be fair, we must adhere to these guidelines. Please, bump this thread with your request on October 3. Thank you for understanding.
 
P

prosenzweig

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2004
Messages
22
Back again and I hope I complied with the 30-day rule... I hope I can get an update on the listing of "rosenzweig.info" and learn if there are any problems with my most recent submission of the site.

Thanks in advance for your response. :)

Cheers,
Peter Rosenzweig
 
P

prosenzweig

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2004
Messages
22
Don't mean to rush anything, but is there some expectation by when the review will be completed?

Thanks,
Peter
 
gboisseau

gboisseau

Member
Joined
May 6, 2004
Messages
1,016
There is no way to know when one of our volunteer editors will be reviewing your site for possible inclusion in the directory.
 
gboisseau

gboisseau

Member
Joined
May 6, 2004
Messages
1,016
This may sound pickier then my friend dogbows response, but,, we require that you wait 6 months after your previous status request. This means you can bump this thread after April 4, 2005 if your site isn't listed by then.

WHEN TO POST:

* Wait at least one month after you last (not first time) submitted your site to start a thread here asking about its status.
* Wait at least six months after getting a status update from an editor about your submission before asking for the next status update.
* If you're coming back to get an update on the status of your site, please do not start a new thread. Reuse the original thread you started. It would probably help if you bookmarked the thread the first time around.
Click to expand...
 
P

prosenzweig

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2004
Messages
22
Rosenzweig.info

Thanks for your update - I was originally asked by one of your reviewer to put the submission into the anonymous section. Looks like requirements have changed. Any chance that this submission will every be reviewed...? I originally submitted this site a year ago (i.e., May 2004)...
 
O

oneeye

Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2002
Messages
3,512
I was originally asked by one of your reviewer to put the submission into the anonymous section
Click to expand...
No, you said that was the category you picked - it wasn't found there so a resubmission was suggested. We don't normally check the site here to see if you picked the right category, only check it is there or not, that is your responsibility. The reviewing editor, when the site is reviewed, will make the decision as to whether it is right or not. In this case they said it was incorrect and moved it.
Any chance that this submission will every be reviewed...?
Click to expand...
Please see the FAQ section on this site. All sites that are waiting for review will eventually be reviewed and either moved, listed, or rejected. Your site has been reviewed and moved. It now needs another editor to review it for the category it has been moved to. When that might be is an unknown - we would tell you but we don't know ourselves. It could be tomorrow or it might be several years away.
 
P

prosenzweig

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2004
Messages
22
Rosenzweig.info

Attn.: Onneye

Thanks for the demonstrated arrogance in your message. It clearly illustrated that the selection of reviewers needs to be subjected to a review as well. Maybe, individuals with some greater maturity would be a better choice.

I received an email from Arthur Rubin on 05/19/04, who claimed to be initial reviewer of my submission, providing me with the recommendation to move my site from where I originally posted it to the one that is now questioned.

Anyway, it would be appropriate that replies from DMOZ demonstrated a little bit a greater respect to the user community.

Thanks,
Peter
 
bobrat

bobrat

Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2003
Messages
11,061
There's lots of replies in this forum that might be found to be arrogant, but I cannot understand what problem you find in this one. It seems it's just a factual explanation of the review process.
 
H

hutcheson

Curlie Meta
Joined
Mar 23, 2002
Messages
19,136
Put aside your inferiority complex: just read and learn. Then, someday, somewhere, you'll be able to help someone out by telling them what they need most to know -- and some of them will call you names because it wasn't what they wanted to hear.

Unfortunately, you can never tell ahead of time which ones it will be.
 
This site has been archived and is no longer accepting new content.
Top