Bobrat told you the real story. "Fair" for hotel directory sites, means you have 59 seconds to show something unique, or the reviewer is off to the next site, and only 8 million more to review. Two minutes filling out personal information, and ... bzzzp, your time is up! That's fair.
And ... if the editor had gotten past that, the next thing might be spot-check for coverage. That's been mentioned several times, and the site flunked. No, there's no question whatsoever that the editors leaned over backwards to give your site much more time than usual for HD sites, and gave it multiple chances. And there's no question whatsoever that they made the right decision for the surfers. And that's all that matters.
Now, if you want to take this into account -- these considerations that real surfers will have -- and make changes in the site, it'll be more valuable for surfers. That may not make it more valuable for you -- it's your choice. But you know some landmines to avoid. Don't put towns where you don't have hotels. Flag your really exclusive listings: editors will skip past the duplicates looking for unique content, if they can easily figure out which IS unique.
Bobrat told you the truth: registration for surfers is acceptable at a reputable site. But for a site still trying to BUILD a reputation it's suicide. I don't care how many pleasant words you put on your privacy policy -- you can't possibly say ANYTHING I haven't seen on some spammer's site. (And even with a reputable site, I'm not giving real information until I'm ready to start buying!) I'm not sure I trust certification either. On the other hand, I've been to over a hundred thousand random websites, without getting a virus: so I DO trust MY privacy policy. And THAT is: registration on a site without a reputation is absolutely verboten.
And ... if the editor had gotten past that, the next thing might be spot-check for coverage. That's been mentioned several times, and the site flunked. No, there's no question whatsoever that the editors leaned over backwards to give your site much more time than usual for HD sites, and gave it multiple chances. And there's no question whatsoever that they made the right decision for the surfers. And that's all that matters.
Now, if you want to take this into account -- these considerations that real surfers will have -- and make changes in the site, it'll be more valuable for surfers. That may not make it more valuable for you -- it's your choice. But you know some landmines to avoid. Don't put towns where you don't have hotels. Flag your really exclusive listings: editors will skip past the duplicates looking for unique content, if they can easily figure out which IS unique.
Bobrat told you the truth: registration for surfers is acceptable at a reputable site. But for a site still trying to BUILD a reputation it's suicide. I don't care how many pleasant words you put on your privacy policy -- you can't possibly say ANYTHING I haven't seen on some spammer's site. (And even with a reputable site, I'm not giving real information until I'm ready to start buying!) I'm not sure I trust certification either. On the other hand, I've been to over a hundred thousand random websites, without getting a virus: so I DO trust MY privacy policy. And THAT is: registration on a site without a reputation is absolutely verboten.